But true. A friend of mine is a DofT examiner. He has been threatened by male relatives of "females" who are taking their driving test for asking to see ID that shows their whole face. He has also had "ladies" who wear gloves during the test and do not speak at all - he strongly suspects that some of these people are in fact male! He has mentioned this to the head examiner, but in effect has been told that it would not be wise to flag this up as it would open a can of racist worms. The male relatives also demand to sit in the car and talk constantly to the examinee in their own language. One of the DofT guys around here speaks fluent Farsi, and during a test spoke in their language to ask the bloke in the back to stop giving the lady guidance for her test as it was illegal!
Wearing a burqa for religious reasons is fine, but when it impedes the laws of the country in which you are living, your religion has to take second place. This is becoming more enforceable now (at last) and people who claim "racism" are being told in the courts to get a life and conform. I should also like to point out that this applies both ways, and what applies to one should apply to all.
Part of the problem is that large sections of the community have the same name.
When I worked for Yorkshire Electricity we were told that Mohammed in itself is not a given name. It simply means Man and similarly with Begum which means married woman.
So an electricity bill address could not be registered as Mr Mohammed or Mrs Begum. We were told to ask for a family name as well.
That also applies to the Patels from India as it is just as common.