for some reason ? Blimey.
Here's the reasons according to PB
WE HAD PLENTY OF SPENDING MONEY: "we didn’t lose out on players because we couldn’t, or wouldn’t, meet a particular transfer fee or a wage demand; neither did we break our wage structure to secure the players we did bring in."
BAD LUCK:" finances aside, failed medicals are rare – we had 2; players being recalled to their club at the point of signing for another because of an injury/issue affecting a team mate are even more unusual – again, we had 2."
WE DID OUR DUE DILIGENCE: "these issues don’t mean our scouting or due diligence was flawed; quite the opposite. Our medical staff were excellent in detecting unforeseen issues. We’re spending millions of pounds. We won't take risks."
VINCENT JANSSEN DIDN"T FANCY IT "when a player decides not to join a club, it’s often about him wanting to stay with the club he’s at, rather than snubbing the club courting him; the two things are very different, albeit we know the net result is the same. "
NO IT WASN'T TIM KRUL's fault "and, no, we didn’t miss out on a loan striker because we signed a loan GK; we took a conscious decision to take an excellent loan GK when the opportunity arose. "
etc etc
https://nortr3nixy.nimpr.uk/showt...nsfer-Window&p=8109739&viewfull=1#post8109739
Timing was the biggest problem. By leaving the deals to the last minute we were always going to suffer if the unexpected happened as we had no time to look at alternatives. That is the lesson that must be learned. Not landing a striker has cost us plenty of points so far and we can’t repeat the mistake if we want to stay up.