Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] How much is Joao Pedro worth?



Cheggers

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2011
521
Bang! And the dirt is gone.
Show me the queue. Or a credible rumour that anybody is eyeing him up. Just because we've got some eye-watering transfer fees lately, we'd be unwise to assume that every player we buy will double or treble in value after a year or two!
We won't be getting £100M for Ferguson either - or anything like it; not at the moment anyway.
Are you implying that no club is interested in buying JP?
 
























Questions

Habitual User
Oct 18, 2006
25,737
Worthing
Show me the queue. Or a credible rumour that anybody is eyeing him up. Just because we've got some eye-watering transfer fees lately, we'd be unwise to assume that every player we buy will double or treble in value after a year or two!
We won't be getting £100M for Ferguson either - or anything like it; not at the moment anyway.
I still think he’d be snapped up by anyone at 30m. Not good enough yet for the top 5 unless we’re 5th……. He’s 50m
 






GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
50,522
Gloucester
I'm confident you're underestimating him.
We'll see. Obviously, things can change over time, but right now I see a good player who it's great to have in our squad (but not always in the starting XI) - but not one that we can sell on for a big profit.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
54,695
Goldstone
We'll see. Obviously, things can change over time, but right now I see a good player who it's great to have in our squad (but not always in the starting XI) - but not one that we can sell on for a big profit.

He's not always in the starting 11 because he's been a bit out of form and kept out by Georgie, who is playing really well and worth more than the £40m we paid.

We won't be wanting to sell him on for a big profit, we'll be wanting to keep him. But if someone were to offer slightly more than £30m, we'd turn them down.
 


Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
71,265
Withdean area
We'll see. Obviously, things can change over time, but right now I see a good player who it's great to have in our squad (but not always in the starting XI) - but not one that we can sell on for a big profit.

I do understand your reasoning.

He joined us as a quality Championship striker for £30m. His form hasn’t been consistent, he’s much to learn, but he has proven himself to be a PL level forward and finisher. I think Spurs or West Ham would benefit by having Pedro, possibly Chelsea.
 




Questions

Habitual User
Oct 18, 2006
25,737
Worthing
Baleba £60m - still learning hopefully he’ll stay another season, then likely to be £75m

Pedro £60m - goal scoring, adaptable forward

Hinsh £50m currently. Potentially a brilliant player, but experience wise early days.
No way 50m no way
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
55,380
Surrey
I'm not sure you can easily tell what JP is worth. One thing is certain, he's worth more than the £30m we paid for him to us. As for the market, it really depends on circumstances. How happy JP is here, how desperate potential buyers are for a striker, and whether our club has a replacement lined up by then.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
50,522
Gloucester
He's not always in the starting 11 because he's been a bit out of form and kept out by Georgie, who is playing really well and worth more than the £40m we paid.

We won't be wanting to sell him on for a big profit, we'll be wanting to keep him. But if someone were to offer slightly more than £30m, we'd turn them down.
Would we? OK.

I thought the plan was always making marginal improvements - making a few quid on Pedro and spending less on a more than adequate replacement would be absolutely so Brighton.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
50,522
Gloucester
I do understand your reasoning.

He joined us as a quality Championship striker for £30m. His form hasn’t been consistent, he’s much to learn, but he has proven himself to be a PL level forward and finisher. I think Spurs or West Ham would benefit by having Pedro, possibly Chelsea.
Yes Spurs and West Ham probably would - not so sure that Chelsea fans would put up with any more Brighton! - besides, they've actually built quite well, and probably wouldn't benefit in the way you suggest.
However, none of them would want to pay much more than £30M - so they wouldn't, and there'd be no sale.
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
54,695
Goldstone
I thought the plan was always making marginal improvements - making a few quid on Pedro and spending less on a more than adequate replacement would be absolutely so Brighton.

We didn't let Cuckoo, Caicedo, or Alexis go for a few quid profit did we. If we didn't think Pedro was any good and we could get our money back, or even a slight profit, then sure. But like other clubs, we'll think he's worth more than £30m, so we won't let him go that cheaply.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here