Marshy
Well-known member
I voted 4, but that's just incomings, 2 out so 6 in all
Goldson needs to be garanteed playing every week as he missed so much of last season.I reckon 4 too.
Although I'm still unsure of why Goldson is going out on loan. Heart op aside, he had a full pre-season and is fit, so is he not considered ready, or not good enough?
Hemed going anywhere is a funny one, isn't it? Even putting keeping him aside in order to be "better safe than sorry", he's now away on international duty.
Now whilst communications can clearly take place between a suitor, Hemed's agent and Hemed himself, he's not going to be able to undertake a medical anywhere now is he?
Hemed going anywhere is a funny one, isn't it? Even putting keeping him aside in order to be "better safe than sorry", he's now away on international duty.
Now whilst communications can clearly take place between a suitor, Hemed's agent and Hemed himself, he's not going to be able to undertake a medical anywhere now is he?
Would you imagine that Naylor/Owen know the names coming in, but to retain goodwill with the club, don't blab until agreed?
It can take place on international duty. Man City ready to do that with Alexis in South America. I suppose also a contract can be agreed, subject to medical asap?
The club will let them know what they are happy with them knowing. Some will come with a "happy for this to be leaked out", and some with "not for publication".
I think the club are far more guarded about this stuff than ever before, due in part to Joe Gomez's Lancing visit breaking on NSC. By all accounts anyone who was at work at Lancing that day came under quite some scrutiny.
Would you imagine that Naylor/Owen know the names coming in, but to retain goodwill with the club, don't blab until agreed?
I guess so, but player registration documents have to be delivered to the FA(s) concerned in line with the deadlines don't they? Wouldn't that mean a player was technically transferred, even if the clubs concerned would then reverse it at the next transfer window should the medical (or other technicality) trip the deal up.
I'll add that the club send out a media release ahead of a new signing announcement. Typically now, they only arrive in my Inbox in the 10 minutes or so ahead of the embargo. Often the Argus article is a copy and paste or very lightly revised version of the club release that has been emailed. This suggests to me that Andy Naylor knew no more about the signing than anyone else until he received the email.
(Often I don't see the email until after the club announcement.)
Experienced flexible defender with Connor to Ipswich
Strange how the Argus still have no names or news. Papers such as the Liverpool Echo or MEN have had wall to wall coverage for their clubs all summer, all of which was later substantiated.
Really. They've filed 5 Albion stories today. A pretty average day. They've written updates in the last 48 hours or so with the latest on Debuchy, Hemed, Goldson, Zohore, and Niasse. Naylor discounted Shane Long yesterday, Jovetic last week as part of a long long list of players we've been linked with , all of which turned out to be nothing, and all have been substantiated. He's inexplicably condemned on here but he's had a good window. Yes. They don't file until they've stood a story up but so what.
He's effectively trusted now , even by many of the sceptical on here, and rightfully so. (not all of em of course !!) .
After all NSC users are rightfully a picky bunch when it comes to news about their club. Some are still upset about a single tweet by Naylor about CMS 6 years ago and a poor turn of phrase he made on Deadline Day on 2012.
Obviously NSC , the foreign press and the local press has more , and rumours circulate everywhere including on here , some of which are even true, but the Argus has no names or news ? Blimey.
[tweet]902982015171121152[/tweet]