[NSC] How many people have you got on ignore?

[Brovion]

None, for the same reason as others. Live and let live.

However I did briefly have the Swedish Meatball on ignore, not because I disagreed with him (live and let live), but simply because he was posting on every single thread and it was getting incredibly tedious. I knew it was only going to be so I could have a 'holiday', and after a break of a fortnight or so I felt I could tolerate him again .... only to find he'd been banned!

 

[Insel affe]

Zero


I wonder if I am on some folks ignore list, I could understand why though to be fair, I’m a bit of an idiot.

 

[Westdene Seagull]

I thought none but it seems I have one from years ago - Football Genius AK FG

Numbers are fine, no need to list, unless you feel the urge

Waits for “did someone say something, I have the OP on ignore”

None - putting someone on ignore is akin to sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting "la la la" - i.e. childish.

 

[Chicken Run]

Wow I just checked, 28 I knew the main board was looking too pleasant these days!

 

[The Clamp]

Seen I had one on ignore. No idea why. He’s now unignored.

I had that Swedish nutter on ignore because he posted his shite endlessly and needlessly and despite his sometimes knowledgable input he could get very nasty.

Think he’s gone now.

So no, nobody.

 

[BN9 BHA]

None, I find most people on here are pretty decent.
I don’t get involved or read political threads, I think most of the arguments on this forum are because of politics.

 

[hart's shirt]

I'm hoping that the absence of @Harry Wilson's tackle from this thread is due to him being away from his computer rather than any other reason.

 

[Dougie]

I’ve no one on ignore but A few have come very close to it .

 

[Coldeanseagull]

I just checked, I had three body parts on ignore.
A tit who's a wind up merchant
An Arse who's too stupid to realise
and a **** who's been perma banned now I imagine!
I've unignored them for now, but any tittery or arsery, they're straight in the bin

 

[Eric the meek]

I don't have anybody on ignore.
I used to though. I discovered it by chance, had never heard of him, don't remember any interaction with him, and didn't know how he got there, so I took him off ignore.

With most people you might put on ignore, occasionally they are actually worth reading. They aren't going to always be wrong or write crap 100% of the time, even if some of them come close.

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

No one. And never have.

it’s a mixture of live and let live and being interested, sometimes amused and sometimes angered by the rubbish some people can come out with.

and before someone asks “why put up with being made to feel angry”, a politician (I think it was Jess Phillips) recently wrote that she enjoyed being angry. So do I, up to a point. But the people who anger me most are the current government and their allies, and they’re not on here as far as I know.

 

[Neville's Breakfast]

I’ve no one on ignore but A few have come very close to it .

Well, yeah. Why would anybody register on another team’s forum then ignore their fans ? Not registering at all would achieve much the same.

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Up to 18 now, though some of them rarely post these days.

Main reason is they’ve wished ill on others in a nasty way….. Don’t really need these people in my life and their bullshit opinions…..

On a positive note stacks of posters I really like and would have a drink with.

 

[Cotton Socks]

I’ve no one on ignore but A few have come very close to it .

That's very magnanimous of you. We wouldn't want to upset someone who makes us laugh so much!
In answer to the op none, I just scroll past the replies of any users that are likely to be talking crap! Admittedly with a very quick skim at the 1st sentence or 2 to see if they may say something that adds to the conversation, but I find they generally repeat the same crap as usual.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

52. Seven now banned. Only 3 who still post regularly. But a surprisingly large number who have/had some sort of noble quest as their strapline. Bringer of truth. That sort of bolleaux

I have spent a lifetime dealing with fools and knaves at work, super-keen to share their 'different' opinions, and I'm buggered if I'm engaging with fools and knaves when relaxing. Racists, little Englanders, Trump supporters, Johnson apologists, prancing ninnies, homophobes, people who think people with mental health issues need to buck their ideas up. Sadly I may have binned one or two off for little more than being elderly/reactionary, along the way. Oh well. Never mind.

I admire those who time after time patiently try to engage with certain sorts, many of whom don't deserve such courtesy. I can't do it. This in itself used to be distressing, and my defensiveness about it made me rather strident about it. But when I discovered it is simply one of many of my manifestations of autism, it all made sense.

I am more than happy with the level of interaction I have with the vast majority, the many lovely posters on NSC. It is what it is. And I can brush off the piss-taking.

I do raise an eyebrow, however at the excessively bullish claims from some about how virtuous they are for not ignoring anyone. I presume these people spend hours every day scouring all the world's opinions, from GBNews to The Sun, National Enquirer and even, occasionally the BBC (when they aren't promoting their extreme left wing propaganda) to get a balanced world view. Living and letting live. Heartwarming.

 

[Questions]

Just remembered that I put Swansman y on ignore in the end…..He was a bright lad at times but I had more in common with the Palace lads on here than him…. The ‘It’s my club’ thing is important when I talk with football fans. If someone says Ivquite like Liverpool or Chelsea in that certain way then I’m out of the conversation quickly….

 

[Driver8]

8. Only so much you can read from some people.

 

[WATFORD zero]

52. Seven now banned. Only 3 who still post regularly. But a surprisingly large number who have/had some sort of noble quest as their strapline. Bringer of truth. That sort of bolleaux

I have spent a lifetime dealing with fools and knaves at work, super-keen to share their 'different' opinions, and I'm buggered if I'm engaging with fools and knaves when relaxing. Racists, little Englanders, Trump supporters, Johnson apologists, prancing ninnies, homophobes, people who think people with mental health issues need to buck their ideas up. Sadly I may have binned one or two off for little more than being elderly/reactionary, along the way. Oh well. Never mind.

I admire those who time after time patiently try to engage with certain sorts, many of whom don't deserve such courtesy. I can't do it. This in itself used to be distressing, and my defensiveness about it made me rather strident about it. But when I discovered it is simply one of many of my manifestations of autism, it all made sense.

I am more than happy with the level of interaction I have with the vast majority, the many lovely posters on NSC. It is what it is. And I can brush off the piss-taking.

I do raise an eyebrow, however at the excessively bullish claims from some about how virtuous they are for not ignoring anyone. I presume these people spend hours every day scouring all the world's opinions, from GBNews to The Sun, National Enquirer and even, occasionally the BBC (when they aren't promoting their extreme left wing propaganda) to get a balanced world view. Living and letting live. Heartwarming.

Of the 57, the fact that only 3 still post regularly shows that maybe you're a just a reasonable judge of character, trolls, loons, WUMs, racists, little englanders, general detritus, etc etc that makes NSC what it is

And, as one of the virtuous who have nobody on ignore, I still get exasperated (although more often just a resigned roll of the eyes) by some of the posters, but those moments when their complete and utter idiocy shines through, despite all their attempts to the contrary, are so hilarious that it far outweighs the rest of the they post

Or, even funnier, when they aren't even capable of debate and have to rely on an 'ironic' thumbs up to show their displeasure

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Of the 57, the fact that only 3 still post regularly shows that maybe you're a just a reasonable judge of character, trolls, loons, WUMs, racists, little englanders, general detritus, etc etc that makes NSC what it is

And, as one of the virtuous who have nobody on ignore, I still get exasperated (although more often just a resigned roll of the eyes) by some of the posters, but those moments when their complete and utter idiocy shines through, despite all their attempts to the contrary, are so hilarious that it far outweighs the rest of the they post

Says you

 

[Is it PotG?]

Of the 57, the fact that only 3 still post regularly shows that maybe you're a just a reasonable judge of character, trolls, loons, WUMs, racists, little englanders, general detritus, etc etc that makes NSC what it is

And, as one of the virtuous who have nobody on ignore, I still get exasperated (although more often just a resigned roll of the eyes) by some of the posters, but those moments when their complete and utter idiocy shines through, despite all their attempts to the contrary, are so hilarious that it far outweighs the rest of the they post

Or, even funnier, when they aren't even capable of debate and have to rely on 'ironic' thumbs up

Quite a subjective matter regarding the quality of the content I would propose.