BensGrandad
New member
One for a foul on Ulloa and one on Calderon both woukd have been given if the same happened in the centre circle plus theirs which ws blatant. So 3 in total.
Two. Calde's one first half and theirs. However, having not given the blatant foul on Calde, he should have given the shirt-tug on Leo (or bearhug on Calde from the same incident).
I was convinced Lingard had his legs taken away from him when he ran into the box in the second half, but I was the only one in the crowd to stand up and shout penalty.
I was convinced Lingard had his legs taken away from him when he ran into the box in the second half, but I was the only one in the crowd to stand up and shout penalty.
I shouted for that one too, but only for a laugh. He clearly slipped
He was nudged inside the penalty area but it only looked clear cut from the TV replay but the ref and lino's couldn't make a decision from their perspective on the pitch.
I shouted for that one too, but only for a laugh. He clearly slipped
If you're going to be a prick, you may as well go full Adebayor about it.
This.Two - the one they did get and the one we should have got for the foul on Calderon.
I can understand why many on here are arguing that Brighton should have been awarded at least one penalty and possibly two, one for the Calderon incident and the other for the Ulloa shirt pull.
However how many of you would have been disappointed if penalties had been awarded AGAINST Brighton for the same incidents?
I can understand why many on here are arguing that Brighton should have been awarded at least one penalty and possibly two, one for the Calderon incident and the other for the Ulloa shirt pull.
However how many of you would have been disappointed if penalties had been awarded AGAINST Brighton for the same incidents?