I totally agree with your side of argument and sentiment.
Murray next season would still be a better attacker than Ali J. He is an instinctive striker, great header of the ball and good finisher. So his legs have gone a bit, his brain hasnt.
Ali J has shown nothing that he's even up to being any good in his natural position, to suggest he is a better attacker than a much lauded veteran of multiple double digit campaigns is quite frankly ludicrous.
Murray hadn't become bad, hasn't lost his instincts. What has changed is we have a new manager who has changed formation away from conventional wingers to something narrower, and wants to play through the lines. This simply suits other players more than a more traditional old school number 9.
His lack of game time is a more a reflection of the new managers ethos, shape and way he wants to play than Murray's instincts or ability as a striker.
Yes he's a bit physically slower, he would have scored Maupays and Dunks chances if he were in the same position. But he could have still been an effective sub or suited to some games. To even suggest Ali J could be better in the role than Murray..... madness
He'll be 38 next season.
I do find it interesting that opinions differ so hugeley about Murray vs Ali J. My view is very pro-Ali J, but I have no evidence that he will score 10 EPL goals or more for us this season (a 'Murray aged 35-36' style tally). I have no evidence that G-Pott even plans to select Ali J more than he did last season.
That said, given the choice between a 38 year old who scored 1 EPL goal in 20 appearances, and a 27 year old who scored 2 goals in 10 appearances last season, it would be a brave man to not back the club's decision to go with the younger man, perhaps converting him to an actual striker rather than shoving him out on the wing? Call me clueless . . . .