bha100
Active member
- Aug 25, 2011
- 898
At its basis a house is somewhere to live. A housing crisis suggests there aren't enough places to live - and I'm pointing out that people hoarding multiple bedrooms may be a reason for this.
But looking at some of the posts on here suggests that we don't have a housing crisis so much as a crisis in shortage of nice 4-bed detached houses with gardens.
Which is very 'first-world problem' isn't it?
I have no doubt that lots of people want to buy these houses for a nice lifestyle, and lots of people want to build these houses to make money, and there is a shortage of both, but dressing it all up as "DISASTER: HOUSING CRISIS!!" seems to me to be a cynical way to get the authorities to release lots of green belt to property developers who initially promise lots of affordable housing but ultimately just squeeze in a couple of flats out the back near where the bins are.
Hoarding a bedroom, an interesting idea. I have a spare room, I'm not hoarding it, I don't intend to pop out and find another to add to my collection. it's also used for many things, a workspace, tv room, storage room but would be described as a bedroom if I were to sell this place.
Not sure where you got the impression this was about 4 bedroom detached properties.
We live in a first world country, would be a bit odd if we had third world problems instead of first world one's.
Quite. So lets go back to that phrase ' Housing Crisis'. Is it really?
That's the point I'm getting at.
So in your mind the ONLY solution is to build more houses? Don't you think at some point in this equation, that impacts on the environment, on flooding, and so on, should be weighed against the desire for people to live in very large houses or to own second homes as 'investments' ?
that building has been paused because the developers cannot sell the properties.
maybe we should have a levy on the number of spare rooms in each dwelling?
i do know what you are getting at, the type of homes we have are not suitable for modern life. not going to change for another half generation or more, until then we could build some suitable housing.
There are 800,000 empty in the UK - but it's going to take a Government intent on regenerating the towns/cities where these empty houses are to change that. Not a quick fix to that.
In addition, second homes/investor/ BTL have to be more heavily taxed to make it less appealing. First time buyers often find themselves up against landlords when trying to buy their first property.
I do not own another property but know several that do. Like it or not BTL investors are important to housing and get taxed by additional Stamp Duty, tax on rental income and Capital Gains. If you push these further many will sell up and we have less rental property available. All that will do is push rents even higher.
We don't have a housing, population or immigration crisis.
We have a government dealing with money crisis - nothing new there.
There's plenty of housing to go round.
Whether it be unoccupied streets in Middlesbrough available for £10k
Or
Unoccupied streets in London available for £10bn.
There's a 1001 ways to distribute wealth, chances are many are actually cheaper on 'us' than the current system.
But all the time we (very much myself included) live in 'I'm Alright Jack' world, nothing is ever going to change.
Or maybe they sell up and the property can be purchased by someone who wants to use it as their home, not a commodity to make money from?