- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,304
'Created', not offered like most would say
I'm not most people sweetie xx
'Created', not offered like most would say
You're being too mean modest.
If we want to rid the U.K. Of Islamic terror the Govt could introduce measures that would deal with that constituency of the population.
But then that would be politically unacceptable, wholly extreme and practally disproportionate........in principle then not disimilar to your proposal.
I rest my case.
THE PINK LIONSUp at Palace when we drew 1-1 I was in the Holmsdale and they were singing more about taking it up the arse than they were supporting their own team. Millwall down at the Amex like to accuse us all of having AIDS. However i was once in the Millwall end at Selhurst (don't ask) and Millwall thought it was hilarious to change the words of that shitty woah woah song to "you take it up the arse...,you take it up the arse.." so it's clearly those lads with the obsession for it.
What case? Empty case of lager from the sound of your post?
How is my suggestion "politically unacceptable"? It's far more intolerable to turn a blind eye to homophobia in football.
Or was my post just a way to shoehorn your unrelated political opinion into the thread?
Could you try to be a bit more pompous please. This isn't up to your usual standard. Despite being really pompous.
Don't the police use cameras on weekend nights down West Street (and other similar areas). I am sure i heard that they found that pointing cameras at people was an effective way to eradicate violent behavior.
I think the go pro idea is a pretty good one. The human rights issue of hyper surveillance is surely a moot point given all the CCTV cameras at and around grounds. This way the cameras can be honed in on those behaving anti socially.
Of course the point about this measure not tackling global terrorism is a good one and would need to be addressed before a scheme was set up
For you chicken i will save my absolute best.
I love threads like this with all the sanctimonious invective, and outrage that is lacking in other threads concerning terrorism etc.
These threads allow for unrestricted prejudice against the "pot bellied" football fans that have the temerity to consume (say) 10 pints when going to the football *gasps in horror*.
This is veiled prejudice, because what that really means is the awful working class.
If only football could be more like Glyndebourne many on here would be happy......with a drum obviously.
Sure and if polls by the Met and other police groups roll into policy then they will all be carrying guns soon too.
Wonderful.....#britishvalues #thetwontchangeus #westanddefiant.
Ignorance is strength.
Reading this reminds me of groups who claim prejudice when their right to be prejudicial is taken away.
I'm sure the 'working class', of which I am one, will cope with not being allowed to make demeaning chants about sexuality.
Let me now smash the 'snowflake' shuttlecock back into your court...
Yeah but how is not giving police guns going to solve the global population crisis
#downwiththet
That's quite witty but would presumably be deemed homophobic and banned.
A football fan who directed homophobic abuse at opposition fans has been fined £300 and ordered to pay £85 in court costs.
Leicester City supporter Jason Holmes, 44, was also hit with a £30 victim surcharge after shouting an offensive term during a match against Brighton on August 19.
Holmes, of Mossgate, Leicester, admitted a charge of indecent chanting contrary to section 3 of the Football Offences Act after voluntarily attending an educational session provided by the Kick it Out campaign against discrimination in football.
Commenting on the case, Janine Smith from the CPS, said: "The CPS takes all forms of discrimination seriously and has an important part to play in eliminating it from football.
"This offence was treated as a homophobic hate crime.
"The CPS contacted Kick it Out about the educational sessions they provide and Jason Holmes was offered such a session to help him understand the full impact of his behaviour, which he attended.
"The contribution of Kick it Out to this case has ensured that, as well as facing the consequences of his actions, this defendant will understand why his actions were so unacceptable."
Roisin Wood, chief executive of Kick It Out, said: "Through our work with the Crown Prosecution Service and Leicester City Football Club, we were able to recommend a course of action which ensured that Jason would understand the full impact of his homophobic behaviour.
"At Kick It Out, we encourage rehabilitation through education for individuals or groups that act in a discriminatory manner, where appropriate."
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/15536030.Football_fan_handed_fine_for_homophobic_abuse/
Presumably all the others just haven't reached court yet?
This victim surcharge...I was at the game along with 3,000 others so do we all get a share of the £30 he had to pay?
No, it goes to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, to deal with compensation claims from people who have been physically or mentally injured because they were the blameless victim of a violent crime in England, Scotland or Wales.
I don't think nasty chanting is classed as violent.
Speak for yourself. I nearly screamed for a policeman.