Interesting to see Matt Lucas's view that, were a player to come out, opposing fans would "give you hell".
I really, really don't believe that would be the case, and to suggest it would seems to me like a case of stereotyping in much the same way as he perceives would happen to said player.
For one thing, the first player to come out is, rightly or wrongly, going to find himself (and I say "himself", because there are plenty of out gay female players) at the centre of much attention. He will also be massively supported across all quarters: witness other sportsmen who've made the step such as Tom Daley, Keegan Hirst, Robbie Rogers, Thomas Hitzlsperger, Gareth Thomas and Nigel Owens. The first few games after it happens will be very high profile, as the media descend to observe the crowd reaction.
It's inevitable you might get the odd "wag" (I use that term reluctantly in this situation, as it rather infers a certain wit, which clearly wouldn't be the case if he was making smutty remarks about a gay footballer) chipping in with a comment, or some pissed up bloke or two trying to start something. But I honestly believe that the overwhelming majority of any crowd, be they home or away fans would be entirely supportive, and recognisant of the huge step taken by that player. We all have gay friends, family or work colleagues somewhere in our lives, yet I'm pretty sure even the most old fashioned of guys can manage to walk around their office without bursting into "Do you take it up the arse?" to their workmates. I think anybody attempting to start an abusive song would soon find himself drowned out by hundreds of other, decent, respectful, embarrassed human beings.
I actually find it vaguely insulting, as a football fan, when the media perpetuate the idea that crowds would give an out gay player fifty shades of abuse. I really don't think it is the case. But all the time that view is expressed, then it makes it, sadly, less likely that a player will feel it's worth coming out.
I posted the Lucas interview because I remembered it, and remembered him saying he'd join in with 'I can see you holding hands' if Arsenal play Brighton. I did so because it seems some of us think there is a line to be drawn between (apols, Edna, I know you hate this term, as do I) 'banter' and nastiness. I agree there is a line, but the line is moving and it is not defined by the actual words, but their impact, which is a function of what is meant and what is perceived.
On the one side of the line is humour with a bit of tribal rivalry, clearly all of them mocking all of us. On the other side of the line is malice; where it is accepted that northerners are, in general, thick monkeys who smoke their dole money and batter their kids; and (back to context) where it is accepted that 'poofs' are degenrate perverts.
So some people want the line moved so that it is more easy and common to toss the abuse, happy in the knowledge that hatred of 'others' is right and good. Other people find it all a bit unpleasant and needless, and would prefer the line moved in the other direction.
Personally I feel there is a difference between generic abuse ('shit town, no fans'; does your whippet know you're here') and using abuse not to wind up the opposition but to actually channel hate towards a third party. I suspect the line is moving in the direction of 'we can see you holding hands' becoming unacceptable. How quickly? We shall see.
I think the bottom line is that I may still be on the wrong side of the line (as was Matt Lucas 3 years ago) in that I am not offended or enraged by 'we can see you holding hands'. This is because I don't regard being gay as in any way bad. But let's be honest, I am not gay and I am not holding hands so the chant just whooshes over my head. Were I gay I'd doubtless feel differently. How could you not feel uncomfortable if your identity was being used to inform an abusive chant, especially if most people around you understand it to me meant to be abusive, regardless of how few people actually feel abused by being called gay?
All a bit nuanced, but as Edna suggests, once a few footy boys start coming out, our agonizing will hopefully all soon become as obsolete as the routine racist abuse that used to be chucked about loud and clear at the football till 'kick it out' etc gained traction.