Hemed's disallowed goal

[seagullwedgee]

Think there's some misunderstanding here. The flag went up for the original ball - think it was from Kayal to whoever crossed it in. They were marginally offside, and then pulled it back for Hemed to score.

So, Hemed was fine, but the crosser wasn't.

There is no way on Gods earth that the through ball was played to an offside player, no way at all.

 

[Turkey]

http://youtu.be/hB4YJnFO4TA 2:14 into this. I was convinced he was onside at the time but probably just off..

 

[fleet]

That does look offside now, was sure it was good live.

 

[Triggaaar]

What is wrong with you people? Our coach has seen the replay and said it was offside, yet you're still arguing.

http://youtu.be/hB4YJnFO4TA 2:14 into this. I was convinced he was onside at the time but probably just off..View attachment 73170

And there's the proof. He was off ****ing side!

 

[Dick Swiveller]

Think there's some misunderstanding here. The flag went up for the original ball - think it was from Kayal to whoever crossed it in. They were marginally offside, and then pulled it back for Hemed to score.

So, Hemed was fine, but the crosser wasn't.

You really aren't going to like the highlights. Kayal was played on by pretty much the whole MK Dons team and the fact the ball went backwards.

 

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

Well offside then!

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

I thought the ball went backwards

But this doesn't have any bearing on anything?

 

[Postman Pat]

I thought the ball went backwards

But this doesn't have any bearing on anything?

Apart from the fact that that the ball has to go forwards for a player to be offside......

 

[warmleyseagull]

Apart from the fact that that the ball has to go forwards for a player to be offside......

Just seen the replay on player and it looks as if ball went forwards. Calderwood called it a good decision by lino and difficult to disagree

 

[Giraffe]

I was level with the cross and it didn't go forwards so not offside.

 

[Giraffe]

Think there's some misunderstanding here. The flag went up for the original ball - think it was from Kayal to whoever crossed it in. They were marginally offside, and then pulled it back for Hemed to score.

So, Hemed was fine, but the crosser wasn't.

Again, I was behind the linesman and the flag went up when he crossed it not the pass before.

 

[We're the Stripes]

Apart from the fact that that the ball has to go forwards for a player to be offside......

Was always my understanding, however, what happens if (as in this case), the player who gets on the end of it has come back from a clearly offside position? Not too sure on this.

Immaterial here though - just watched it a few times on the highlights and as mentioned above, it does look like the ball travels ever so slightly forward.

 

[Dick Swiveller]

I was level with the cross and it didn't go forwards so not offside.

Specsavers for you then as the highlights on Player show it did.

BTW - did you know you were quoted in the I yesterday?

 

[dazzer6666]

Looks just offside on the replay. Looks just offside on the still photo. Calderwood agrees it was offside and a good decision............can we just not accept it was offside ?

 

[Dick Swiveller]

Looks just offside on the replay. Looks just offside on the still photo. Calderwood agrees it was offside and a good decision............can we just not accept it was offside ?

 

[CP 0 3 BHA]

Just seen the replay on player and it looks as if ball went forwards. Calderwood called it a good decision by lino and difficult to disagree

Agreed. Careless of Hemed to have drifted offside in that situation.

 

[Everest]

Apart from the fact that that the ball has to go forwards for a player to be offside......

Not true.
It used to be the case years ago, but not anymore

 

[Morvangull]

My understanding is that it doesn't matter if the ball goes forward or backward. It would not be off side if the receiving player is level or further back than the passer.

 

[Hampster Gull]

Looks on to me

 

[Bakero]

Not true.
It used to be the case years ago, but not anymore

How can a player be offside if the ball is passed backwards? That makes no sense. (Unless I've misunderstood, which is possible as I've spent the afternoon port tasting)