I appreciate why these panels must remain anonymous, but it really does give them free reign to make cowardly decisions that they know they'll never be held accountable for.
Its interesting that both of the very senior ex-referees who have written about it in the media have decided that intent is NOT clear, yet their three nameless colleagues, faced with the same evidence, are able to be absolutely sure.
I appreciate why these panels must remain anonymous, but it really does give them free reign to make cowardly decisions that they know they'll never be held accountable for.
Its interesting that both of the very senior ex-referees who have written about it in the media have decided that intent is NOT clear, yet their three nameless colleagues, faced with the same evidence, are able to be absolutely sure.
Plenty of reasons I reckon.
Solidarity with the player who is adamant he didn't do it? Show the premier league we're no pushovers at this level? Tell the fans we're not afraid? Develop a 'hard-done by' narrative? Desperation because we haven't got any other strikers? Deflect our lack of strikers problem from the recruitment team to the FA?
take your pick...
IF it was a complete accident, you'd think that Hemed would have offered some sort of appology as he walked away ? A simply raised hand or something. That's what makes me think he realised what he was doing ... (or am I being too naive?)
Finding this extraordinary that 3 refs can reach the same conclusion.
[video]https://www.clippituser.tv/c/rvalaa[/video]
It's clear that two things are happening. In the first second of video you can see Yedlin moving his left leg towards the space where Hemed's foot will have to come down.
At 6 seconds you can see that Yedlin's movement in towards Hemed's right leg forces him off balance which means he has to fall forwards.
He's landed on Yedlin's leg, but it's accidental.
I appreciate why these panels must remain anonymous, but it really does give them free reign to make cowardly decisions that they know they'll never be held accountable for.
Its interesting that both of the very senior ex-referees who have written about it in the media have decided that intent is NOT clear, yet their three nameless colleagues, faced with the same evidence, are able to be absolutely sure.
Is it three refs or the same panel as for diving offences?
https://www.fourfourtwo.com/news/dixon-mcleish-and-murphy-among-fa-diving-review-panel
Oh no! If they have Nigel Adkins on the panel, we've got no chance at all.
Plenty of reasons I reckon. Solidarity with the player who is adamant he didn't do it?
Rafa says it was deliberate, the FA love Rafa, 3 match ban upheld, end of.
Well no, we shouldn't do that as that would be 'frivolous' and the ban would be extended. Luckily there are better reasonsNo no, don't get me wrong. We should absolutely appeal it even if it's just to waste the useless FA's time.
Does there have to be intent in order for it to be a red card offence? I've spent too much time debating this to waste even more researching the nuances of that.
The three - whoever they are - have already found him guilty.
Rafa has appealed to the FA that there was a push just before the goal, and they have agreed to look at that incident too and overturn the result. Rafa argues that had our goal been disallowed, his side would have gone on to win. Brighton are hopeful that the FA score the result as a draw.Rafa says it was deliberate, the FA love Rafa, 3 match ban upheld, end of.
Rafa has appealed to the FA that there was a push just before the goal, and they have agreed to look at that incident too and overturn the result. Rafa argues that had our goal been disallowed, his side would have gone on to win. Brighton are hopeful that the FA score the result as a draw.