Claret enduced myopia concerning a criminal player. Go and inbreed or whatever you do!
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Hemed stamp [Charged, appealed, banned for 3 games]
- Thread starter tiotom92
- Start date
Claret enduced myopia concerning a criminal player. Go and inbreed or whatever you do!
Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 7,374
There is no whining involved and your abuse is unwarranted and demeaning only to you. I'd guess that you are over-reacting because you sense a slight on your own team's achievement that season. I've nothing against Burnley, but it is an obvious fact that Barton deliberately tried to injure an opponent in that game and got away with it. If you can't see that it can only be because you are looking through claret tinted spectacles. As my brother once said as we both called for a foul for us that obviously wasn't: 'Football. It makes liars of us all.'
8th battalion East Lancs
New member
- Jan 10, 2014
- 540
And yet you typed all that bollocks before, well done.
Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 7,374
He cheated. You prospered. It happens in football. If you let yourself cough it, you'll feel better about yourself. It's not as if admitting the truth will mean you didn't win the league.
Nixonator
Well-known member
Still clinging onto that one? You usually post sensibly but this position lets you down.
It was just about the most blatant stamp you will ever see, performed by one of the most blatantly dirty players in the game (well not anymore thankfully). You dodged one that afternoon, we've dodged plenty before and some dodge more than others so I don't know why you are trying to turn it around on us as if we are all suggesting perennial hardship. Ultimately most would agree that two major incidents in games against our automatic promotion rivals were pivotal in our failure that season, and both went against us. Nobody is suggesting it tars your push for and eventual promotion that season or that our habitual sharing of points didn't hinder ours.
The barton incident(s) doesn't get me anywhere near as riled as the other one mind, but now we have a similar incident a couple years later involving our own player (and only fit striker) and he's given a 3 match ban without a second glance, it is bound to resurface and both compared.
Seriously? So you want the picture of Barton stamping to be taken a couple of seconds before he's stamped
Are you that blind to your sides faults? Barton fouled Kayal, and then so that he could stamp on Kayal he pretended to go and get the ball (which we'd need for our free kick). And then he stamped.It's a fair comment. The ref's decision cost us points that day, so of course it could have contributed.
OzMike
Well-known member
Hehe, I bet your Mrs told you to say that.
sydney
tinky ****in winky
not your typical stamp.....hemed off balance and looked like he needed to change his footing , the other players legs are in constant motion so you are going to have to be happy to take 50/50 odds of connecting if you are intending to stamp , also if you are just trying to change your footing to maintain balance then there is a 50/50 chance of stepping on the grounded players leg..... the toe of hemes's boot makes contact first indicating to me that he was genuinely trying to maintain his balance........don't know who's on the review board ...i'll wait to be gobsmacked by the ruling.
Feel sorry for Tomer, but it seems pretty clear he's going to get a 3 match ban. This emphasises that we were not one, but two strikers short in the transfer window. I'm glad the next game is Arsenal away as we might not expect a result. Let's hope Glenn Murray can get fit soon - at least to face Everton. We need at least two points from Everton at home and West Ham away. !
talk2knighty
Member
- Dec 26, 2014
- 73
Agreed
Not sure I do, to be honest
OzMike
Well-known member
Accidental all day long, slow sporting news day, just the one game being played and he is just being made an example of to deter players even considering doing it in the future.
Reaction of Sky pundits is ridiculous, especially knobs Keys and Curbs.
People who have played the game get it better than others who haven't.
Maybe a blessing in disguise and we get to actually see what the new signings can do.
Just hope we don't drop too many points finding out.
Reaction of Sky pundits is ridiculous, especially knobs Keys and Curbs.
People who have played the game get it better than others who haven't.
Maybe a blessing in disguise and we get to actually see what the new signings can do.
Just hope we don't drop too many points finding out.
I still believe it was unintentional and that the FA's hand has been forced, not by Newcastle, but by a TV company needing to justify its own existence. That said, now he's charged we need to take it on the chin as we can't afford to lose Tomer for an extra game.
Proves two things; firstly there is no consistency in football and secondly that we needed to bring two strikers in. Let's hope Glenn turns in to Lazarus.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Proves two things; firstly there is no consistency in football and secondly that we needed to bring two strikers in. Let's hope Glenn turns in to Lazarus.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Jan 30, 2008
- 831
Hotchilidog
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2009
- 9,122
Pretty much how I saw it. A clumsy attempt to maintain balance in a tight space. Violent conduct my arse quite frankly. Still this is the FA we are talking about here, I expect Tomer to be banned for three games. Play Brown or a resurrected Murray upfront and get on with it.
I am happy to criticise dumb and violent behaviour by our players but to me it looks like Tomer treads on the guy trying to maintain balance, not a deliberate attempt to stamp and injure Yedlin.
Partly this.......it's turned into a big deal partly because we were the only game on Sunday, and it was the only major talking point so it's been discussed to death in the media because of the relentless need to fill column inches and airtime about the PL. If there had been other games, with bigger incidents, doubt there would have been anything like the same clamour.
Don't think he's got much hope of a successful appeal, and do think it was deliberate, but it's at the softer end of the scale (compared with what Barton did for example) - if the ref had seen it would likely have been a red ? Problem is the punishment (as we've seen with the assault by Britos) is the same.
Hemed stamp [charged with violent misconduct]
The rear angle looks bad but gives some cause to think he was off balance. The front angle shows his eyes are on the ball from start to finish. Given Tomer's usual nature, it'd be a surprise if it was deliberate but, if he was an opposing player, we'd probably think it was.
Most annoying aspect I think is that it didn't seem to be much of an issue at the time or afterwards when Yedlin played it down and Benitez didn't seem bothered at all. That seems very unlikely if they'd felt it was malicious. All credit to them for not seeking a distraction from the result (well, apart from the rubbish about a foul on Mbemba, but there's always something with every manager...)
The curse of the slomo replay that makes any contact look bad. I'd have all those sequences including at least one angle at full speed, because if so often looks completely different at game pace.
Oh well. Just have to get on with it when Tomer's side of the story inevitably falls on deaf ears. They'd better all play in carpet slippers in future, just in case.
The rear angle looks bad but gives some cause to think he was off balance. The front angle shows his eyes are on the ball from start to finish. Given Tomer's usual nature, it'd be a surprise if it was deliberate but, if he was an opposing player, we'd probably think it was.
Most annoying aspect I think is that it didn't seem to be much of an issue at the time or afterwards when Yedlin played it down and Benitez didn't seem bothered at all. That seems very unlikely if they'd felt it was malicious. All credit to them for not seeking a distraction from the result (well, apart from the rubbish about a foul on Mbemba, but there's always something with every manager...)
The curse of the slomo replay that makes any contact look bad. I'd have all those sequences including at least one angle at full speed, because if so often looks completely different at game pace.
Oh well. Just have to get on with it when Tomer's side of the story inevitably falls on deaf ears. They'd better all play in carpet slippers in future, just in case.
Tokyohands
Well-known member
WTF? Football's gone mad.
keaton
Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
- Nov 18, 2004
- 9,972
No, because he wasn't charged and got away with a more blatant one.