16bha
New member
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-24647843
Looks like Unite have been caught out by Ineos closure plans.
Looks like Unite have been caught out by Ineos closure plans.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-24647843
Looks like Unite have been caught out by Ineos closure plans.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-24647843
Looks like Unite have been caught out by Ineos closure plans.
This is bad news all round though as it gives a mandate for petrol prices to ramp up.
Ineos made £2 billion profit in the UK last year and $48 billion profit worldwide
last year and you critisize a union for fighting against a pay cut for it's employees?
NSC is sounding more like the Daily Mail every day. Shame on you!
Here we go again....profit is not a dirty word....if firms did'nt make a profit there'd be no firms...no firms,no jobs....the job was withdrawn because the unions wanted to blackmail the firm....unions have far too much power to say how a firm is run. Yes it is a pay cut...most people have taken a cut in real terms and nobody is forcing them to work for Ineos....they have offered reduced terms or no job...see Unite have gone back with their tail between their legs and agreed to the new terms when they found out their grandstanding has failed.Ineos made £2 billion profit in the UK last year and $48 billion profit worldwide
last year and you critisize a union for fighting against a pay cut for it's employees?
NSC is sounding more like the Daily Mail every day. Shame on you!
Ineos made £2 billion profit in the UK last year and $48 billion profit worldwide
last year and you critisize a union for fighting against a pay cut for it's employees?
NSC is sounding more like the Daily Mail every day. Shame on you!
Here we go again....profit is not a dirty word....if firms did'nt make a profit there'd be no firms...no firms,no jobs....the job was withdrawn because the unions wanted to blackmail the firm....unions have far too much power to say how a firm is run. Yes it is a pay cut...most people have taken a cut in real terms and nobody is forcing them to work for Ineos....they have offered reduced terms or no job...see Unite have gone back with their tail between their legs and agreed to the new terms when they found out their grandstanding has failed.
The employees as you called them are working for Ineos...not Unite.
Nobody said profit is a dirty word. Just that if companies make massive profits then it seems only fair that not only the shareholders are rewarded with dividends but the people that contributed to achieving those profits benefit, whether that be by improved conditions, higher pay or even profit related bonuses.
I didn't think the workers in question did contribute to Ineos's profits, as this section of the plant is significantly loss making? Assuming so, is Ineos now supposed to be a charity?
Nobody said profit is a dirty word. Just that if companies make massive profits then it seems only fair that not only the shareholders are rewarded with dividends but the people that contributed to achieving those profits benefit, whether that be by improved conditions, higher pay or even profit related bonuses.