- Thread starter
- #21
I slightly disagree - Just slightly
I think he makes for good funny TV.
There are some players who will quite willingly put themselves forward for ridicule or admiration, so long as the price is right.
You only have to look at people like Gary Linicker and all those Naff Walkers Crisps Adverts - Gary is laughing all the way to the bank and is probably for the most part emotionally unaffected by it.
Que also Chris Kamara - He is also happy to put himself up to be poked fun at and he too laughs all the way to the bank with the TV Companies Monies in his hip pocket.
Its when they prey on the emotionally vulnerable ones like Paul Merson or Gazza to have the Public say ''Awe - Poor them '' : Programmes like X-Factor do it all the time. Throw in a sob story so that we can all have a weep about and at the expense of vulnerable people. That doesn't sit well with me.
Lots of Footballers are going through hard times by virtue of Messy Divorces or Addictions of some sort but who would never open themselves up to Public Consumption for a quick Financial Fix.
The ones who are willing to open themselves up for the money are being exploited by the TV Companies and that's a shame. It is no better than prodding a bear with a stick to make it dance for the Public as far as I am concerned, although in this instance, the stick is Dollar Bills or £ Notes.
Oh sure it's made the programme more interesting (partly because they have failed to secure some higher-profile - and fitter - players that would have made the actual football more of a story) but it's now all about Ruddock and his drink (and food, and smoking) problem, everything else is incidental (he's not even playing). The fact they played a team of naked players and no-one is talking about that sums it up really. He should have been binned off for his own good, and given help - that wouldn't sell much advertising time though..........................his antics have derailed the whole (original) point of the programme.