Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
The arrogance lies in believing that you can decide who is a 'proper musician'.
Fair enough, arrogant it is then
The arrogance lies in believing that you can decide who is a 'proper musician'.
It's like the difference between Margarine abd Butter.The arrogance lies in believing that you can decide who is a 'proper musician'.
They wouldn't have got enough cash from Margarine...No, the butter money paid for keeping PIL running, currently on a full tour.
He was inspirational to me when I was 18, and I still have affection for him. Fearless, uncompromising, and very interesting music. Happy birthday John.
This sends shivers down my spine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DLDRTppkBs
Except thats not him, but a weird soundalike called 'Johnny Rotter' dressed up like JL circa 1978. As Lydon refused to have anything to do with the 'Rotten' moniker at the time he was doing this era PIL he's even got that wrong. Surprised Wobble had anything to do with this, unless it was some sort of joke on Lydon reforming PIL without Levene and him.
If you want to judge him on a 30 second advert against a music career spanning 40+ years then i guess you have a point.
Right, makes sense. Shame it wasn't the original lineup (and Jeanette Lee of course).When Lydon reformed PIL and spoke to Wobble & Levene about it he was only prepared to have them as paid musicians rather than equal partner in a band so W&L did it the're way.
.Unfortunately that is not Rotten, its Nathan Matherick AKA Johnny Rotter ( a good friend of mine) who is with SPE
Lydon did not wan to reform with Wobble & Levene.
But as you can here, he is very good.
Rotter & Rotten backstage at the O2 in Birmingham.
View attachment 71985
A character? Definitely
Part of the soundtrack to my youth? Absolutely.
Very inspirational? If that means Very inspirational to a few people then probably. I cant recall many musicians stating that John/Johnny was the reason they started in music but no doubt somebody will come up with someone. We are all inspired by different people.
Proper musician? Who am I to judge? but if enough people thought enough of his music, why has he had to resort to butter adverts to prolong his music career after 40 years in the business?
Cant argue with any of that, fella.Money. I think it may be money. And why not? He was great on 'I'm a celeb' too. And his appearance on Juke Box Jury was classic. I admire people with a considered opinion, well based on the facts, who do what they want and say what they want, and his attitude always inspired me. In fact, I'd go as far as to say he influenced my career. I get a small number of plaudits from a few folk who share my attitude to what I do (heart research) and don't give a stuff that the majority of careerist wankers who compromise themselves over the latest fads, while abandoning the scientific method, think I'm a 'rough diamond, without any actual diamond'. ****ing frauds, if you ask me. JL was and will never be a fraud.
I wouldn't say he hasn't been involved in some very good music (although, for me, only with PiL) - 'Careering', 'Rise' and 'Ease' would be standouts imo. But his relentless self-aggrandising grates more than a little and rather than fearless he always comes across (evenin stories he tells himself) as inconsiderate, which to me is not the same thing at all.the soundtrack to a pissed off angst ridden teenage Pevenseagull. 30 years on still sounds fresh as a daisy and I'm still pissed off.
Good work John, I am envious of anyone who doesn't rate the guy as they probably exist in some halcyon, blissful world of relentless shallow joy.