clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 26,304
If anyone gave a toss about handball, it would get some decent coverage. It doesn't.
It does across Europe, millions. I find it completely unwatchable, but it's massive.
If anyone gave a toss about handball, it would get some decent coverage. It doesn't.
That's a silly analogy - you've gone to a ridiculous end of a spectrum to try to make an irrelevant point.
Running along with a ball gripped in your hand before chucking it towards a goal is INFINITELY easier than trying to dribble along with a ball at your feet before shooting. The ball is gripped in your hand FFS, its not out in the open. Are you going to dispute that ?
I'm not even a massive cricket fan, but I can certainly recognise that its a game that involves FAR more multitudes of refined skillsets than handball. Which is why nobody watches handball, its just one of those niche little minority sports. Easy to pick up and play - a doddle - which is why its popular in some quarters as a participation sport. But very few people give a shit about it, because nothing about it is ever spectacular or interesting.
If anyone gave a toss about handball, it would get some decent coverage. It doesn't. That should tell you all you need to know. Its about on a par with archery.
Well that´s an unwinnable discussion trying to say cricket is better more skillfull than handball or vice versa. Having played cricket as a boy in Brighton and then learning handball when I moved to Copenhagen, I can vouch to Swannsman & Easy Boy that they are both great but very different sports. And both much much better than my two pet hates as "sports" American Football and Synchronised Swimming.....
It does across Europe, millions. I find it completely unwatchable, but it's massive.
And to Swanssamn - Hope that Denmark win the World Championship!!!! Ideally thrashing Sweden along the way!!!
It does across Europe, millions. I find it completely unwatchable, but it's massive.
Yes I'm going to dispute that, just like in basketball you're not allowed to take more than three steps with the ball without bouncing it meaning its more out in the open than its not.
Its interesting that you see handball as a "small minority sport" when it is one of the most popular sports in Europe, far more popular than cricket. Its the second biggest sport in the biggest country in Europe (Germany), its the third most popular team sport in France after football and basket, in former Yugoslavia its the number 1-3 sport in every country, same in the Nordic countries.
Since handball is the far more popular sport on our continent, it does got decent coverage pretty much everywhere in Europe, just not in the UK.
Yes I'm going to dispute that, just like in basketball you're not allowed to take more than three steps with the ball without bouncing it meaning its more out in the open than its not.
Its interesting that you see handball as a "small minority sport" when it is one of the most popular sports in Europe, far more popular than cricket. Its the second biggest sport in the biggest country in Europe (Germany), its the third most popular team sport in France after football and basket, in former Yugoslavia its the number 1-3 sport in every country, same in the Nordic countries.
Since handball is the far more popular sport on our continent, it does got decent coverage pretty much everywhere in Europe, just not in the UK.
For the 0,23% of you who care, Sweden beat France in the semi final. Other game is onging but will be Spain or Denmark in the fiinal.
That's a silly analogy - you've gone to a ridiculous end of a spectrum to try to make an irrelevant point.
Running along with a ball gripped in your hand before chucking it towards a goal is INFINITELY easier than trying to dribble along with a ball at your feet before shooting. The ball is gripped in your hand FFS, its not out in the open. Are you going to dispute that ?
I'm not even a massive cricket fan, but I can certainly recognise that its a game that involves FAR more multitudes of refined skillsets than handball. Which is why nobody watches handball, its just one of those niche little minority sports. Easy to pick up and play - a doddle - which is why its popular in some quarters as a participation sport. But very few people give a shit about it, because nothing about it is ever spectacular or interesting.
If anyone gave a toss about handball, it would get some decent coverage. It doesn't. That should tell you all you need to know. Its about on a par with archery.
For the 0,23% of you who care, Sweden beat France in the semi final. Other game is onging but will be Spain or Denmark in the fiinal.
I love NFL, as you seem to as well, but it's hardly a global sport.
Why so harsh on handball? It's huge on the continent. Just because it's not here there's no reason to belittle it. I quite like cricket too but can certainly see why it's not a global sport. Handball's a lot more fast pace for a start. Of course its extremely skillful too if you play at top level.
Out of interest, how big is handball in Sweden? Are we talking national sport kind of level? Congrats on making the final, anyway. Intriguing sport, all the more so for us as it's never taken off here
For the 0,23% of you who care, Sweden beat France in the semi final. Other game is onging but will be Spain or Denmark in the fiinal.
Apart from football, I don't think there are any genuinely global sports. Everything else is either popular in specific countries or regions (like handball or american sports) or only in former colonies or similar like cricket or rugby.