MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,876
For all the words written in this thread, it basically comes down to this. Amazing how people can make a judement when absolutely no evidence has been provided.
Actually, I forget. This is NSC. That's relatively normal.
I think that's the main point I'm trying to make.
That you can't pass judgement without evidence, but you CAN tend towards one side provided (what you feel to be) sufficient information.
I reckon there's enough there to lean me to one side, others on here don't. Some are claiming more information than others.