That's the point - it's got f*** all to do with the Leeds game friday, which is what Gus should have all his focus on given our 6 game slump - not on some other distraction weeks away.
Just means we'll be scheduled to play away on boxing days from now on. It's hardly a big deal is it.
Yes it is. It means travelling to the Boxing Day game will be a ball ache EVERY year instead of every other year.
It's either that or never play on Boxing Days.
I thought Gus was all for having a winter break? Now he has got one, the whole Christmas week without a game. I bet the players with family and kids are pleased. Seems something over nothing to me, from Poyet's point of view. The people who should be most pissed off is us, the fans!!!...He should concentrate more on getting the team to win games of football, like he is paid for.
Exactly this. Sad but true, from the second the fixtures were released I was convinced this would be changed. It would have been easier if they had just switched the Millwall games, play at the Den on Boxing Day and home on 22 September.
Maybe in the future the club can get something sorted with Southern, the Bus company etc, but this ground was always about public transport, right from the off, without it, the ground doesn't work. The attempts to get hundreds of bus and rail staff to work on their boxing day, to open stations, to man signaling facilities, was unsuccessful this year, and it might be a while before they are successful, but it really is not embarrassing, it is not the clubs fault. Can you imagine the carnage if it had gone ahead, with no buses, no P&R, no trains? Now that would have made us a laughing stock.
(All IMO of course, others may think otherwise)
Things have certainly changed! When did public transport stop on Boxing day? When i lived in Brighton, they were always just off on Christmas day.
Here they get 3 hrs off to go home and have lunch with their family (and probably get half pissed too )
I think that is part of his point - he's been told winter breaks are a no no because we have to have boxing day fixtures in this country. Now he's being told a boxing day fixture can be moved because it inconveniences bus companies. I think that is part of his anger.
Exactly how did you extrapolate that theory from the article on the website. Based on the quotes, and knowing how PR and journalism can work to put pressure on people, I've suggested that could be a possible reason for the article.
Why would he be asked to put pressure on people when the fixture has only recently been changed after apparent negotiations? The fixture has only publicly been changed, but I'm guessing – as has been mentioned above – that the club knew that they would not be able to move it a while back, due to the actions of bus drivers, council, etc. Have you confused yourself here? Don't you mean 'the club knew that they would have to move it a while back'. And what has it got to do with the council whether Southern run a train service to Falmer on Boxing day?
Who do you think these people are that can now make it happen and who asked him to apply pressure? I think the people that run the buses and trains, as well as the AMEX stewards and staff can make it happen. Maybe Paul Barber or Tony Bloom has asked him to highlight it? Or maybe it comes from the PR department, as I suggested before. I doubt it has anything to do with the Stewards who would work whenever. The buses would probably be less of a problem as it would almost certainly be down to paying enough money. Trains cover a wider area and need station staff on duty at most of the stations, signalling, transport police etc etc.
Are you suggesting the club didn't do enough to persuade Southern to run a train service just for this one football match or talk to the bus/coach companies to run the park and rides etc. No I'm not suggesting that at all. What I AM saying, though, is that whatever conversations were had between the different parties didn't result in a positive outcome for Boxing Day football - something the club realises the fans want. In that respect, I think they are trying to ensure it happens in the future, and getting a big page story in the run-up to Christmas is a good start.
Now after all your questions, let me ask you one: "Had we maintained our early season form I suspect GP would not even have got involved with the debate." What the fcuk has that got to do with anything?
Simple, if we were top of the league and playing great, he would probably have said it's disappointing not to play on boxing day but it is what it is with the stadium we have and leave at that. But he is under pressure so he has said more than he needs to. Surely with your fantastic insight into PR etc, you could spot that but apparently not!!!!
As far as I'm concerned, Boxing day games are purely traditional, and a long way from being the most important fixture in the season. Like other traditions, they are prone to changes, for example, playing at 3pm on a Saturday, playing on Xmas day with return fixtures on boxing day, players wearing the numbers 1-11, no subs, tape instead of a crossbar, balls with laces, pitches a quagmire in the winter months etc etc.
As far as I'm concerned, Boxing day games are purely traditional, and a long way from being the most important fixture in the season. Like other traditions, they are prone to changes, for example, playing at 3pm on a Saturday, playing on Xmas day with return fixtures on boxing day, players wearing the numbers 1-11, no subs, tape instead of a crossbar, balls with laces, pitches a quagmire in the winter months etc etc.
Except that it is only us not playing on Boxing Day, everyone else still is (apart from our opposition).
I very much doubt that we are blazing a trail here.
Obviously you guys havant be going to football long enough to know the importance of Boxing Day football .