[Albion] Guendouzi cleared
- Thread starter Philzo-93
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
Bias. Not surprised, one rule for one...
Miximate
Well-known member
Not bothered...3 points, move on!
surrey jim
Not in Surrey
Means he wont be banned for their games vs Southampton and Norwich,
Hopefully Arsenal bounce back and take 6 points from those fixtures
Hopefully Arsenal bounce back and take 6 points from those fixtures
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
That is the right way to look at it but it still stinks.
Oh, so VAR saw it and said it was OK - splendid stuff chaps, Arsenal player won't get suspended and all is well with the world!...................don't they realise Arsenal aren't a big team any more?
Pity VAR wasn't so alert when Olly Norwood scored, eh?
Pity VAR wasn't so alert when Olly Norwood scored, eh?
Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
I am a little bothered because it implies a level of justification and that in turn suggests that Maupay provoked the assault.
(Which I suppose he did, but until wonderfully choreographed last minute goals are banned it's irrelevant.)
pb21
Well-known member
- Apr 23, 2010
- 6,688
On the one hand this shouldn’t be an issue at all; we won and Guendouzi will now be available against our rivals.
On the other hand (the one Guendouzi had around Maupay’s throat), it is an issue, as if the boot had been on the other foot, Maupay would be looking at a three match ban minimum.
On the other hand (the one Guendouzi had around Maupay’s throat), it is an issue, as if the boot had been on the other foot, Maupay would be looking at a three match ban minimum.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,132
That's just ****ing ridiculous.
Nearly as bad as when Newcastle had 2 red cards overturned for one game.
We have consistently had all of ours rejected.
Nearly as bad as when Newcastle had 2 red cards overturned for one game.
We have consistently had all of ours rejected.
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
The authorities appear VERY selective in the situations VAR is used. Both times you mention, the decision comes out in favour of the 'big' club.
Equally our fault apparently. What a load of tosh
An FA statement confirmed: "Brighton and Hove Albion FC and Arsenal FC have been warned and reminded of their responsibilities following a mass confrontation between their players at the end of the Premier League fixture on Saturday.
"In addition, Matteo Guendouzi’s conduct during this incident was not seen by the match officials at the time, but it was subsequently reviewed by the VAR, so he will face no further action."
An FA statement confirmed: "Brighton and Hove Albion FC and Arsenal FC have been warned and reminded of their responsibilities following a mass confrontation between their players at the end of the Premier League fixture on Saturday.
"In addition, Matteo Guendouzi’s conduct during this incident was not seen by the match officials at the time, but it was subsequently reviewed by the VAR, so he will face no further action."
Albion Dan
Banned
Who cares at the end of the day. Our business with Arsenal is done so probably best they are now as equipped as possible to get points off our rivals.
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
We won, #### 'em.
Move on to Leicester.
Move on to Leicester.
Gwen Doozy's got away with one there.
Sadly it won't stop the gooners from crying into microphones and targeting Maupay, Shawcross style, for the next 10 years.
Sadly it won't stop the gooners from crying into microphones and targeting Maupay, Shawcross style, for the next 10 years.
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
He shat himself when BDB waded in good enough for me 
Taybha
Whalewhine
Nothing actually surprises me anymore concerning professional footballs governing bodies , they make it up as they go along and this one is a doozy .
Its violent conduct so punishable , it's not punished
, looney tunes at Football HQ strikes again .
Its violent conduct so punishable , it's not punished
, looney tunes at Football HQ strikes again .
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,267
Whenever there is an on-pitch brawl after the final whistle those involved will be able to point to the lack of intervention by VAT and today's decision as a precedent.