btnbelle
New member
- Apr 26, 2017
- 1,438
It really is not that simple though is it. This is not just about available roles for women, they can do any job they like if they can get that job. They won't be paid as well and will find it harder to get promoted though obviously.
If there were men appearing as eye candy at all women's sporting events, as well as equal pay for women, equal rights globally for women and equal chance of being promoted for women, then probably no one would bat an an eyelid about the fact that some women appear scantily clad at various sporting events for the titillation of men, but as that is not the case then it is probably for the best that we drop this pointless custom.
Again it is not these women who are setting the bad example, but the overall impression is that, especially for the young. You need to take your view away from the actual women standing on the track, and think more broadly about women in general.
I am happy for men to do these kind of roles too. I guess such roles only exist where there is a demand for them though.
The issues around gender and equality are separate to the roles women do. Of course pay needs to be equal but axing these girls won't change pay discrimination. Women can do any job they wish today. There is a percentage of the population who are looking to work in this kind of industry, maybe due to being paid well for low skilled work.
Women are mainly paid less because they are perceived to be care givers and take time out for having children. The only thing that can change this, is men taking time out to look after the family while women go back to their career. Employers won't know who to discriminate against when choosing staff then.
I am not sure how society suffers because they are there. If a young girl asks her parents why women do the job, can we just explain to them that it is a choice open to women.