A certain NSC poster has been very quiet on the two Bennett threads
A certain NSC poster has been very quiet on the two Bennett threads
Personally I'll be voting for who i think will best represent my constituency, such is my disdain for the major parties at the moment.
In the General Election so will I. In the local? Anyone But Green.
That's the end of her career. What a shambles.
Not the best interview, Natalie is not a patch on Lucas
That said unlike UKIP who claim to be different, the Greens are a real alternative to the 3 main parties. Yes, they have some crack pot ideas, but stick to their core ethos. A lot to be said for that...
Whilst I have no sympathy for the Greens, apart from their actual green ideals (their implementation is another thing), and I know their policies on non-green issues are nothing short of barmy, but she had a brain-freeze, she went blank ...many people say we should not have career politicians, well if you don't this is what you'll get more often - people making mistakes, normal people do. If you don't want lifelong politicians you need to accept things like this.
Having said that, I've aways found her particularly inept and quite unlikable .... But my point stands.
According to Green Party sources, Natalie Bennett is "considering her position"
Seriously, why didn't she just say she didn't have the figures to hand? Admit she should have been more clued up before the interview and move on.
What really is unfathomable is that she recently went on TV and got completely humiliated for not knowing the figures behind her policies, yet, as the LBC clip shows, she then went on the radio and again didn't have adequate figures! At this point we only have three possible scenarios. A) the figures have never been costed and are likely pie in the sky estimates ungrounded in anything resembling fact or B) she's knows the facts but would rathe humiliate herself publicly, multiple times, than reveal them - or C) She's an idiot.
Why on earth isn't Caroline Lucas still the leader?
I just hope that Caroline Lucas (and other minority party MPs to be fair) are judged on their performances as constituency MPs rather than this sort of nonsensical interview from on high.
Let's be clear - UKIP, Greens, Respect and a good few others are not going to be in a position to dictate national policy. At best, they might influence it. So why should we even pay attention to interviews detailing macro level policy for such insignificant parties?
Personally I'll be voting for who i think will best represent my constituency, such is my disdain for the major parties at the moment.
Well this is the point. She is seen as very credible in political circles. And she can carry an interview well.
In the General Election so will I. In the local? Anyone But Green.
Caroline Lucas stepped down when she was elected as an MP so she could concentrate on that role.
The one thing I will say about this car crash of an interview is that at least she's discussing housing, something none of the other parties is tackling seriously (beyond a few platitudes).
I was discussing this with a friend the other day (whose wife is a local councillor for one of the major parties) and expressed amazement that no party is talking about the housing issue and the difficulty that young people will have getting a home in the future (or indeed, now). It should be near the top of the agenda but it's the great unmentionable
Yes, and looking at local polls it appears she is in a good position to be returned again. A lot of folk see her more as an independent than a Green. Which helps her cause.