I believe Mrs Ashley Barnes wants to have six kids, but unfortunately her husband keeps missing the target.
*coat*
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Great work from the coalition
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
I believe Mrs Ashley Barnes wants to have six kids, but unfortunately her husband keeps missing the target.
*coat*
Yes but you have to remember that these basic facts do nothing to pander to the angry simpleton.
Angry Tory boy does not want to hear or even care that benefit fraud amounts to a tiny fraction of the money handed over to the banks in recent years. It is far more important to Tory Simpleton to correct the "wrong" that the woman he doesn't even know at the end of the road with 3 kids is living in a house almost as nice as his. She should be in the gutter and so should her kids.
Was not Was
Loitering with intent
- Jul 31, 2003
- 1,607
That's a nonsense, though, because:
1. people move in and out of benefits. What are they supposed to do: if their hours drop and they move on to benefits, kill the first born?
2. most people on benefits are the working poor, whose wages are so low they are entitled to benefits. The logic of this position is basically social cleansing; only the middle-income middle-classes and people with unearned wealth should have kids (Personally, I think it should be more of a priority to ensure people are paid a living wage, which probably makes me a loony lefty)
3. People who are seriously poor are generally in poorer health and live shorter lives (This doesn't apply to everyone on benefits in the UK, clearly). There's loads of evidence that, as a species, we have more children in these circumstances, almost certainly because it's the best chance of passing on our genes. Look how birth rates go down as nations get richer. It's not down to economic incentives or what politicians say, it's what we're like.
KNC
Well-known member
Now I know you're taking the piss!!!
- Thread starter
- #46
When did Seb Coe move over to the dark/red side?
Or do you mean Beckham? I can't see him being a leftie.
Hatterlovesbrighton
something clever
Did he also mention something about people paying their taxes?
Colossal Squid
Returning video tapes
Yes but you have to remember that these basic facts do nothing to pander to the angry simpleton.
Angry Tory boy does not want to hear or even care that benefit fraud amounts to a tiny fraction of the money handed over to the banks in recent years. It is far more important to Tory Simpleton to correct the "wrong" that the woman he doesn't even know at the end of the road with 3 kids is living in a house almost as nice as his. She should be in the gutter and so should her kids.
Careful, that makes sense.
Colossal Squid
Returning video tapes
GreersElbow
New member
Thank god for 1pc. f*** me, we are well in the clear now boys. Plain sailing from now on.
severnside gull
Well-known member
In fairness I think the "in living memory" bit is a tad over-generous
somerset
New member
Of course, no argument there, mine was perhaps a simple statement on the futility of stereotypes in this type of debate,... the usual Tory Boy or Leftie comments don't help, but are inevitable on this forum.
GOM
living vicariously
Oh goody, another political debate, I wonder who will win this time and whose opinions will be changed. ?
somerset
New member
Now that is amusing..... EP showing his human side..... mention him again however( I can't even bring myself to say his name) and I may not be responsible for my actions.
I don't care how miniscule they are. As a taxpayer I have no desire to bankroll people on benefits who decide to have large families.
In fact, given the option, I would prefer that taxpayers did not stump up for any kind of benefits. Leave it to charities,
Tubby Mondays
Well-known member
Given that the previous poor quarters werent the fault of the government (excuses ranged from snow, a royal wedding to Osbornes butler having a day off), how can this successful quarter, when the country was visited by thousands of foreign tourists spending money, be as a result of the governments policies?
Enjoy sucking each others cocks whilst it lasts because come next quarter normal service will have been resumed.
Although that will obviously cover the winter period, so youd better start praying for snow. Or that Harry knocks up some sloane and has to get down the aisle pretty rapid.
Enjoy sucking each others cocks whilst it lasts because come next quarter normal service will have been resumed.
Although that will obviously cover the winter period, so youd better start praying for snow. Or that Harry knocks up some sloane and has to get down the aisle pretty rapid.
Tony Meolas Loan Spell
Slut Faced Whores
somerset
New member
Yes but you have to remember that these basic facts do nothing to pander to the angry simpleton.
Angry Tory boy does not want to hear or even care that benefit fraud amounts to a tiny fraction of the money handed over to the banks in recent years. It is far more important to Tory Simpleton to correct the "wrong" that the woman he doesn't even know at the end of the road with 3 kids is living in a house almost as nice as his. She should be in the gutter and so should her kids.
Of course you are aware that this money that the banking system borrowed, is being paid back to the government, with interest, as the banks recover performance. In the case of LBG, that I happen to know a bit about,.. the current forecast is that they would have paid all those billions back in 2-4 years from now.
....unlike of course, the billions paid out on benefits, often to those not entitled, or frittered away in well publicised wastage in the public sector. Not much of that is ever recouped is it.
Colossal Squid
Returning video tapes
I put it in quotation marks as it's a thread title that was used on this very board.
It's certainly true of my adult life however, having known only three chancellors, of which it is staggeringly obvious that Osbourne is the weakest