Skalak wasn't even playing on the same side as Tomori so not sure which game you were watching...
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Great game Tomori
- Thread starter Mental Lental
- Start date
Skalak wasn't even playing on the same side as Tomori so not sure which game you were watching...
D
Deleted member 2719
Guest
I like him, a big plus today.
origigull
Well-known member
- Jun 29, 2009
- 1,251
Skalak has been playing well the last two games and was probably played because of this and his away from home defensive attitude (negative thinking by CH). March has a more attacking game and comes on when we are chasing the game and losing. I would rather March start games as it gives us more attacking options.
Wtf? Stupid tackle for the pen cost us the CHANCE of one point. How the hell did he cost us two? Barely put a foot wrong and not remotely at fault for the first goal. His excellent tackle repelled the first attack - no fault of his that Taylor got his cross in.
Quite. What a din.
BensGrandad
New member
Played well until the silly and unnecessary tackle but in his defence he was the better of our two full backs today.
Not poc in the prem. he'd get roasted
Murray (if anyone - team game) cost us two points.....not Tomori.
BensGrandad
New member
Murray should have scored with the open shot which went straight at Green anywhere else and it was a goal. Plus a couple of poor headers.
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
Very good centre back playing full back. Didn't do a bad job.
I think he was the second-best player out there, behind Hünemeier who was superb again.
albionfan37
Well-known member
Who would you go for then that won't break the bank he will be much better with a pre season under him and playing more regularly
sjamesb3466
Well-known member
Thought he defended excellently today except for one rush of blood. He is very quick, strong and I can see why Chelsea rate him.
Bruno is much better going forward and links much better with AK however considering he is double the lads age it's not surprising that Bruno uses his experience to improve his game.
Bruno is much better going forward and links much better with AK however considering he is double the lads age it's not surprising that Bruno uses his experience to improve his game.
mreprice
Active member
Very good defensively and showed great pace to make a couple of excellent tackles.
But did absolutely nothing going forward including his throw ins. And gave away a penalty. So I'm not sure great is the right word.
But did absolutely nothing going forward including his throw ins. And gave away a penalty. So I'm not sure great is the right word.
darkwolf666
Well-known member
Yes you are right, this is a democracy, which means you are entitled to your opinion, even if it is wrong!
How did he cost us TWO points. We were 1 down at the time of the penalty, so likely the best we could have hoped for was a draw and one point, so he could have cost us ONE point.
Unless you thought up to the time of the penalty that we were going to push on and win, in which case he cost us THREE points.
The challenge for the penalty was rash, but he alone didn't cost us any points.
darkwolf666
Well-known member
More experience or more ability? I know which way I am leaning?
sjamesb3466
Well-known member
Both at this stage of his career however for a young lad playing in a very hostile environment I think he coped very well. A good prospect.
For a start rosenior, and also bong. The trouble with poc is that he can defend ok but he's so poor in the air.
albionfan37
Well-known member
Never rosi he needs to cut back on his right foot slows the game down to much. That would be even more apparent one step further up imo poc is better than bong but not much between the pair of them