Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
And is clearly unaware of what 'presumptuous' means.
Guessing he meant 'preposterous' ?
If we’re going to nit pick, we’re not in the Premiership either
And is clearly unaware of what 'presumptuous' means.
Guessing he meant 'preposterous' ?
Talking of pond life on Twitter, look at this, where do you start with what's wrong?
And is clearly unaware of what 'presumptuous' means.
Guessing he meant 'preposterous' ?
If we’re going to nit pick, we’re not in the Premiership either
If we employ an unexperienced manager who wants to play attacking football we're going to get ripped apart. Prepare for a long season. And remind yourselves to be careful what you wish for.
They lost their nerve very early though..
Saints made a great move with Pocchetino that got them a similar slagging off to us and CH at the time. That turned out rather better.
....with a rubbish defence and abysmal goalie yes.I’d be cautious too. Looking at Swansea’s away games against the bigger teams in the Championship, they were routinely being smashed 3-0 or so whilst giving away set-piece goal after set-piece goal. We could have to forget about marginal 1-0 defeats at Anfield or fantastic draws at the Emirates. We’re going to be shipping plenty with this guy.
He's not playing expansive football at Swansea he's a pragmatic manager that likes to play passing football. With an emphasis on attack.
Do you think he got those great results against European giants with a Swedish minnow playing 'expansive' football. No he can adapt game to game and within games.
Give the guy some respect he's clearly not an idiot !!
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Maybe one for another thread, but how many sides have tried to change things up in the way we seem to be, and what were the results?
The only one that comes to mind is the Palace / de Boer experiment. That one didn't go too well...
Fair comment. It was a bit trite. But I've seen numerous examples of clubs opening up, trying to play attacking football and being ripped to pieces. I honestly don't think we've got the squad to do it. If we sign Potter and we try to play the way Swansea do in the PL, £50 to REMF says he'll be gone before the end of the season. Totally hope I'm wrong. Hand on heart I think Hughton set up the way he did because we don't have the attacking players to approach games any differently.
I disagree, we have attacking players who were being stifled in an overtly defensive system.
Andone, Bissouma, Propper, Knockaert, Gross, Alireza, March and Locadia were all having to sacrifice their attacking instincts to play Hughtons way.
I’d be cautious too. Looking at Swansea’s away games against the bigger teams in the Championship, they were routinely being smashed 3-0 or so whilst giving away set-piece goal after set-piece goal. We could have to forget about marginal 1-0 defeats at Anfield or fantastic draws at the Emirates. We’re going to be shipping plenty with this guy.
I’d be cautious too. Looking at Swansea’s away games against the bigger teams in the Championship, they were routinely being smashed 3-0 or so whilst giving away set-piece goal after set-piece goal. We could have to forget about marginal 1-0 defeats at Anfield or fantastic draws at the Emirates. We’re going to be shipping plenty with this guy.
Initially they were zonal marking which I think was why they were giving up a lot of set piece goals..... as the season went on they changed that and improved.
I understand what you're saying, and likewise with [MENTION=19]Icy Gull[/MENTION] - it's a fair comment. Personally I feel Hughton did give those players a go particularly post December when we were all but safe AND he changed the system to make us more attacking. It was a complete failure. Why? You say tactics, I say players. The truth probably lies somewhere in between.
And their new Austrian chap definitely helped turned them around, I'm sure with Hughes they would have gone instead of Cardiff
They also had average defenders.