He is launching an 'initiative' through his deputy mayor for policing, Kit Malthouse, to try and reduce gang influence and knife crime.
He has a plan to revive London's 'lost' rivers... turning Fleet Street into a canal with gondolas!
He is launching an 'initiative' through his deputy mayor for policing, Kit Malthouse, to try and reduce gang influence and knife crime.
dont think they would have gone to war on the " evidence" that labour provided.. . I am prepared to be corrected on this, but what exactly was the Tory policy on Iraq?
.
now you're turning into a bit of an old cynic arent you ??or sanctioned the murder of one of the key witnesses.
now you're turning into a bit of an old cynic arent you ??
dont think they would have gone to war on the " evidence" that labour provided.
In an opinion poll after the Hutton whitewash... only 38% believed that David Kelly committed suicide.
The amount of coproxamol tablets was one third of the normal lethal dose.
The knife which supposedly he cut his wrist with had no fingerprints on it, not even his own (and he wasn't wearing gloves).
There have been several expert witnesses testifying to the FACT that there were no other instances of death of adult males by cutting their own wrists that YEAR, and that in the cold, outside it would be even less likely.
Reports from paramedics on the scene said there was little blood in evidence.
Nice work Tony, I hope this haunts you to the grave.
i dont think so, but iam prepared to be corrected , even if they did , only blair would have known it was lies wouldnt he ??sadly yes, in fact didn't the leadership of all 3 parties have access to the same information
i dont think so, but iam prepared to be corrected , even if they did , only blair would have known it was lies wouldnt he ??
what, you think blair would have invited the two leaders to view the evidence and then admitted it was all a bag of bollocks ?Maybe, maybe not, maybe none of them.
i dont think so, but iam prepared to be corrected , even if they did , only blair would have known it was lies wouldnt he ??
what, you think blair would have invited the two leaders to view the evidence and then admitted it was all a bag of bollocks ?
would have thought they would be subject to the 90 year rule.I haven't said what my thoughts are; the point that I'm making, in response to a question that surely only the prime minister would have known it was all lies (if it was), is that we don't know. Politics at a macro level is nothing the like the lives that the rest of us lead and it is perfectly possible that there are three plausible scenarios here. All IMO of course but the next administration could always release the files, then you'd know for sure eh?
at which point the quality debate put forward starts to fade away. I understand Spielberg peddling the myth - it'r reactionary, it's in the daily mail - it must be true.
But dont start joining in please