Albumen
Don't wait for me!
Baldock >> CMS. Far more intelligent and skillful.
I guess you could believe that, if you chose to ignore the start of this season Baldock had before he got injured
Baldock >> CMS. Far more intelligent and skillful.
Baldock >> CMS. Far more intelligent and skillful.
Baldock >> CMS. Far more intelligent and skillful.
Baldock not good enough I'm afraid. He has had plenty of chances to prove himself at Championship level, and not just with us, and has never delivered.
Although CMS strike rate is still better than Baldocks for the Albion.
Although CMS strike rate is still better than Baldocks for the Albion.
No, I didn't. Thought he made a nuisance of himself putting pressure on their CBs. Didn't do a lot with the ball but had very limited opportunity. Certainly did a lot of closing down though.Listening to WA last night, he said CH and CC were going mad at Baldock soon after he came on. Anyone at the match see what that was all about?
Baldock's more of a team player.
Totally disagree. He was fine this season, ran Ipswich ragged away. He'll get his chance to start again, that's for sure.
Baldock's more of a team player.
No, I didn't. Thought he made a nuisance of himself putting pressure on their CBs. Didn't do a lot with the ball but had very limited opportunity. Certainly did a lot of closing down though.
But don't we pay him to be a striker to score goals then?
Good strikers are known to be selfish.
Any chance you could show a bit of support to one of our players after a long lay off? He might not be the most prolific striker but he is still another option for Hughton in this crucial run in.But his primary job is to score goals. We need our strikers to score more, and not just Sam B.
Careful. This fact will cause a Sam B lover reaction.
What 2 goals in 19 for a striker is not memorable in my opinion.
I would say Wilson has scored more than that in at least half the starts.
There's a wider debate buried in here that I find really interesting - should a striker be judged only by his scoring record?
People have been having the same debate about Jordan Rhodes, only Rhodes is the Yin to Baldock's Yang: a striker who scores lots of goals but doesn't do much else. He also attracts the same polarised opinions between people who just look at his record and people who take into account the other things he does.
Personally I can see the benefits of both but think the focus should be on THE TEAM scoring rather than the individual, in the same way coaches tell kids that you defend as a team you also score goals as a team. If Baldock is making runs that open up space for other players to score that should be taken onto account, just ball watching is a classic football supporter thing to do. In the early part of the season he was part of a system that was winning games, just because he wasn't the one putting the ball in the net it doesn't mean he's any less important.