So loan him for a year.Let him go a spread his wings and play. The bloke needs game time that Rangers can offer him and we can't. It's simple.
So loan him for a year.Let him go a spread his wings and play. The bloke needs game time that Rangers can offer him and we can't. It's simple.
How is it a mistake if he wants to go ?
We can't keep an unhappy player , that would be disruptive and send out signals to other potential signings.
Its a shame but it can't be viewed as a mistake.
The club is a business at the end of the day and in Connors case he has been extremely unlucky in quite a few ways since joining us , the almost ever present of Dunk and Duffy duo limited his appearances and for whatever reasons CH didn't employ a rotational system involving Goldson and the deadly duo so i fully understand Connors reasons for wanting a move , but as a business move i see it as a bad bit of business for the club , so bad business is a mistake imo , time will tell as it always does , i just think we should do everything possible to have kept him at the club , perhaps we have done that and he still wants to go , who knows but whatever we get for Connor and we remain a premier league club his replacement will cost a pretty penny more than the 3.5 touted unless we get extremely lucky with a freebie of his standard .
I fully agree about the unhappy player scenario it's not good for anyone at all , i just would have liked him to remain at Brighton because for me he has the talent and scope to become a fantastic player who will command a very large transfer fee with the next suitor after Rangers if that's indeed where he is set to go .
It's clear he wants to play football and whatever happens i wish him well . (typed with a slightly furrowed brow )
Loan him for a year. Can then sell him for a similar amount after a year, or if he progresses as well as some of us expect him to, he can then come back and fight for a place in the starting 11. We may have had to sell Dunk by then.Rather keep Goldson but he wants out.
£3.5m seems to be his market value so not sure what else we can do.
Loan him for a year. Can then sell him for a similar amount after a year, or if he progresses as well as some of us expect him to, he can then come back and fight for a place in the starting 11. We may have had to sell Dunk by then.
Good point but i don't think that is an option.So loan him for a year.
Kids played 34 league games in three seasons, and that dearth of appearances is not going to change anytime soon. He's 26, he wants to play. Let him go.
As for the fee, seems little to some of us, but another point of view, being espoused in particular by Celtic fans on Twitter is "£3 million ??!! For a nobody with heart problems who's made 8 appearances in the last two years??!! You've been royally stitched up haha! "
I’d loan him, but I think he wants this move so all we can do is get his current market value and hopefully a decent sell on
So he wants to play for Gerrard - a man with zero managerial experience, for a club with questionable finances. How sure are we all that Gerrard will still be managing them going into the following season? In his position I'd be quite happy with playing one year and seeing how it goes.Good point but i don't think that is an option.
They are still at least three times as big as us........If not more.
If you rely upon history and supposed reputation maybe. The most accessible figures available online show their income in 2016 as being just over 16 million pounds, and yes they were in the Scots 'Prem' by then. I think we have safely surpassed that by now.
I know I’m picking on parts of your post but:
Crowd every other week otherwise league 1 crowds.
Bigger move, other than VVD can’t think immediately of others recently.
Few top players these days, only prem flops.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m not sure that is a fair assessment really. Let’s not get all high and mighty based on 2 seasons in the top tier.
Rangers are a much bigger club than us
What's all this stuff about playing for Gerrard about can someone explain to me? Gerrard was a good footballer however has pretty much next to nothing managerial experience.
Loan him for a year. Can then sell him for a similar amount after a year, or if he progresses as well as some of us expect him to, he can then come back and fight for a place in the starting 11. We may have had to sell Dunk by then.
I think he said demonstrated he’s as good as the other two. I didn’t see Duffy put in a performance like his against Watford all season.
But the reality is Hughton prefers Duffy. I think that’s in part because Duffy plays the stopper role. Whereas both Goldson and Dunk are better readers of the game and play off of one another rather than having distinct roles when they play together.
It’s a tactical preference.
Probably more experience than Mullery and [cough] Venables in the 1970s, and boy did those two flop. Anyway, it's not as if Gerrard is trying to waltz straight into a PL or Championship team, is it?What's all this stuff about playing for Gerrard about can someone explain to me? Gerrard was a good footballer however has pretty much next to nothing managerial experience.
Probably more experience than Mullery and [cough] Venables in the 1970s, and boy did those two flop. Anyway, it's not as if Gerrard is trying to waltz straight into a PL or Championship team, is it?
Fraser Forster, Ki Sung Yueng, Victor Wanyama all quite recent. Gary Hooper signed for Norwich in the PL and Artur Boruc went straight from Celtic to Southampton, although neither moves really worked out for them I don't think. Steven Davis at Southampton, although he might have been part of the Rangers exodus when they folded. I think there's a lad from Rangers or Hearts who now plays for Liverpool isn't there*? It's not a constant stream but there's plenty of precedent if you're good enough.
Edit - from Dundee Utd, ended up at Liverpool via Hull (when they were in the Prem).