But you're on a PUBLIC messageboard. I'm not infringing on your privacy. I merely posted a link which you've dimissed. I haven't tried to ram anything down your neck. It's a Christians' duty to try to highlight to non-believers the word of god, after that it's in your hands to decide whether to follow or remain the same.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
GOD: How much do you believe in him?
- Thread starter El Presidente
- Start date
But you're on a PUBLIC messageboard. I'm not infringing on your privacy. I merely posted a link which you've dimissed. I haven't tried to ram anything down your neck. It's a Christians' duty to try to highlight to non-believers the word of god, after that it's in your hands to decide whether to follow or remain the same.
Hillian1
( . ) ( . )
You are Liz Costa and I claim my £20.
Good question. Since he was god it seems impossible. Even when fasting in the desert for 40 days and 40 nights he didn't give into the devils temptations. He couldn't have died for us if he was a sinner.
sten_super
Brain Surgeon
Genuine question, did you read that thing that you posted earlier, and do you really believe all of it?
I actually did start reading it, and got about 6 paragraphs in, and it started talking about the Bible being the literal word of God, and those that refute this are not true believers, etc. etc. I'm pretty sure much earlier in the thread someone bought up some of the less publicised acts that are recommended in the Bible (the Old Testament in particular), which are completely wacky. Do you believe that the Bible is the literal word of God, and do you believe that we should all live our lives as the Bible lays out, stonings and all?
Albumen
Don't wait for me!
And it's an atheists duty to highlight the irrationalities of religion (with added sneer and pity).
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
The Fermi Paradox.
bhaexpress
New member
Only if they have a mind as narrow as yours. Frankly I don't consider that I do and I'm sure I'm not alone here.
Of course i don't believe in stoning. I don't believe in inflicting violence. JC didn't have people stoned. The general point i took from that article is that Satan and his works are alive and well in this world and it's upto us to turn away from Satan. Like Mr Burns keeps pointing out that i said 'the kids dying in africa are lucky' and he took it out of context. I meant that if their rulers are happy to inflict suffering and famine and death on them and do Satan's work then those children are better off away from that. I would much rather those children were born into safe surroundings. But Satan is at work there and there isn't much that can be done to stop the Satanists. Any aid workers that go over there and try and do good are at risk of death, what is the answer to that
MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,876
Of course i don't believe in stoning. I don't believe in inflicting violence. JC didn't have people stoned. The general point i took from that article is that Satan and his works are alive and well in this world and it's upto us to turn away from Satan. Like Mr Burns keeps pointing out that i said 'the kids dying in africa are lucky' and he took it out of context. I meant that if their rulers are happy to inflict suffering and famine and death on them and do Satan's work then those children are better off away from that. I would much rather those children were born into safe surroundings. But Satan is at work there and there isn't much that can be done to stop the Satanists. Any aid workers that go over there and try and do good are at risk of death, what is the answer to that
This is a disgusting post.
Albumen
Don't wait for me!
Nibble
New member
- Jan 3, 2007
- 19,238
Of course i don't believe in stoning. I don't believe in inflicting violence. JC didn't have people stoned. The general point i took from that article is that Satan and his works are alive and well in this world and it's upto us to turn away from Satan. Like Mr Burns keeps pointing out that i said 'the kids dying in africa are lucky' and he took it out of context. I meant that if their rulers are happy to inflict suffering and famine and death on them and do Satan's work then those children are better off away from that. I would much rather those children were born into safe surroundings. But Satan is at work there and there isn't much that can be done to stop the Satanists. Any aid workers that go over there and try and do good are at risk of death, what is the answer to that
You are an odd chap eh!
Albumen
Don't wait for me!
Of course i don't believe in stoning. I don't believe in inflicting violence. JC didn't have people stoned. The general point i took from that article is that Satan and his works are alive and well in this world and it's upto us to turn away from Satan. Like Mr Burns keeps pointing out that i said 'the kids dying in africa are lucky' and he took it out of context. I meant that if their rulers are happy to inflict suffering and famine and death on them and do Satan's work then those children are better off away from that. I would much rather those children were born into safe surroundings. But Satan is at work there and there isn't much that can be done to stop the Satanists. Any aid workers that go over there and try and do good are at risk of death, what is the answer to that
Gotta be WUMming now.
Your answer proves that article right!
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Neither statement is true. We don't really know enough about how common life (of any type, let alone intelligent) is or isn't in the universe to say with any authority.
Nibble
New member
- Jan 3, 2007
- 19,238
It's at times like this I ask myself "What would Jesus do"?