I know, but I was saying the site is helpful generally.It was between balls 3 and 4 though, so it's not helpful.
So what sort of goal was it then, Dickhead? (no offence....)Goal, but it wasn't a 'goal' goal.
Nutshell,that was a goal...but at the end of the day we look at the result of a 1-1 draw and nothing will change that...sometimes it even falls in our favour...but if any Watford fan asked me that question in all honesty I would have to say it was a goal....but on your bike...the table says it was'nt.That's a goal. Every one of you would be screaming blue murder if that was ours.
Goal, but hey, shit happens.
Inconclusive.![]()
View attachment 48067
(Sorry for the thin lines but) The vertical black line splits the ball down the centre. The horizontal black line shows the same distance either side of the centre, and matches well with where the edge of the ball is. The black line along the goal line is a conservative estimate of where the line is behind the post. And it's still not in.
I know, but I was saying the site is helpful generally.
So what sort of goal was it then, Dickhead? (no offence....)
Yep perfect angle, the line is accurate, and it's a no goal from me![]()
Forestieri's looked like a yellow card to me. His momentum meant he couldn't pull out of the tackle. A ref would probably send a player off maybe twice out of 10 in that situation, especially when considering the conditions.
The conditions? You mean the pitch soaked before the game by obligatory use of the sprinkler system?![]()