[Albion] Goal line Technology - North goal line camera

[stss30]

Never a penalty for me. Contact minimal

I thought it was a pen in real time, watching it back don't think so!

 

[clippedgull]

Never a penalty for me. Contact minimal

Agreed.

Also the ref/lino have to make instant decisions without VAR and as it was barely a contact then it's understandable that it wasn't given.

 

[seagull_special]

AK No, Lingard Yes

 

[Icy Gull]

AK No, Lingard Yes

Nope, contact was made after Lingard got his shot away, no penalty.

Not enough contact for AK to get a penalty either

Ref got both right imo

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Watch it back, is all I'll say.

Have done afterwards, watch Martials feet, got the wrong side of Knockaert and made contact.

Not seen anything to think otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Never a penalty for me. Contact minimal

But contact.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Bold Seagull]

It would never have been given if it wasn't for goal line camera. Pawson was giving us nothing.

As per normal. He’s a big team sock puppet.

 

[Bold Seagull]

Have done afterwards, watch Martials feet, got the wrong side of Knockaert and made contact.

Not seen anything to think otherwise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Watched a replay after and thought bit soft, THEN, there’s one angle which really does nail it as a penalty for me - I actually think he’s fouled twice. Other end and that’s given.

 

[DarrenFreemansPerm]

Never a penalty for me. Contact minimal

Whilst I agree, as usual it’s the inconsistency that frustrates, a few minutes after the incident Groß put his hand on Mata’s shoulder and he flopped to the floor, Neville said correct decision for a free kick but he wasn’t having Knocky’s penalty shout. I know they’re different fouls but they were both equally weak in my opinion.

 

[DarrenFreemansPerm]

AK No, Lingard Yes

I reserve the right to disagree.

 

[Tricky Dicky]

Never a penalty for me. Contact minimal

Was never a pen. Doesn't matter about the refs performance, he simply would not have been able to give the goal, no way could he have known for sure it was over the line, linos never help in these circs.

An inch is always enough for me !

 

[Bodian]

A couple of ManU players immediately tried to intimidate the ref, as they expertly do, that it didn't cross the line .... but soon shut the **** up.

I think to be fair to them, they went up to the ref to ask why/what?, and he simply pointed at his watch - then the couple of players who had gone up to him pointed at where their watches would have been to the other players to show them why the decision was made. I don't think there was any real argument or attempt at intimidation. And that's where something like goal-line technology wins out over the still fairly subjective rulings of VAR. It was either over the line or it wasn't - and players seem fairly happy to accept it. I can't imagine that ever having been given as a goal without the technology, and we'd be spending all day today arguing about it!

 

[Horses Arse]

Nope, contact was made after Lingard got his shot away, no penalty.

Not enough contact for AK to get a penalty either

Ref got both right imo

What about that pen against us at Derby. Cross was made before Dunk clattered the guy and pen was given. Pundits all thought that was a fine decision. Haven't seen such a decision since. Have the rules changed or are pundits all just twats I wonder....

 

[seagull_special]

I reserve the right to disagree.

Absolutely now go and change Junior’s nappy!

 

[AZ Gull]

What about that pen against us at Derby. Cross was made before Dunk clattered the guy and pen was given. Pundits all thought that was a fine decision. Haven't seen such a decision since. Have the rules changed or are pundits all just twats I wonder....

When I read [MENTION=19]Icy Gull[/MENTION]'s post I thought of exactly the same incident (but it was Greer's challenge, not Dunk's).

 

[DarrenFreemansPerm]

Absolutely now go and change Junior’s nappy!

Ha, just been done by my own fair (clumsy) hands.

 

[Napier's Knee]

I think to be fair to them, they went up to the ref to ask why/what?, and he simply pointed at his watch - then the couple of players who had gone up to him pointed at where their watches would have been to the other players to show them why the decision was made. I don't think there was any real argument or attempt at intimidation. And that's where something like goal-line technology wins out over the still fairly subjective rulings of VAR. It was either over the line or it wasn't - and players seem fairly happy to accept it. I can't imagine that ever having been given as a goal without the technology, and we'd be spending all day today arguing about it!

exactly - look at Rojo in the highlights. He goes up to the ref to ask why the goal has been given, ref points to his watch, Rojo just shrugs 'oh well'

 

[Postman Pat]

These are the real heroes....this is a picture my son took of them testing it pre-season in the North end.

 

[TSB]

But contact.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Too happy to argue, so the only thing I'll say is that if you give that one, you will end up giving four penalties a game most of the time.
Rather like that Zaha one against Watford.

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Too happy to argue, so the only thing I'll say is that if you give that one, you will end up giving four penalties a game most of the time.
Rather like that Zaha one against Watford.

Never argue with you TSB, I enjoy your posts too much.

Just don’t agree...... [emoji2]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk