Soton Seagull
Well-known member
So with the topical 'Mickey out' campaign gaining momentum, where do we stand in the giving managers time to develop a team side of things?
It seems increasing amounts of managers (Ince for one I suppose) are getting the boot, despite inheriting teams and not being given the magic element of 'time' to turn things around.
Has the short termism of football gone too far? Is there any value in allowing a coach time to get things right or is it correct to demand instant success?
Would supporting the idea of giving time, yet calling for Adams' head show great hypocrisy?
It seems increasing amounts of managers (Ince for one I suppose) are getting the boot, despite inheriting teams and not being given the magic element of 'time' to turn things around.
Has the short termism of football gone too far? Is there any value in allowing a coach time to get things right or is it correct to demand instant success?
Would supporting the idea of giving time, yet calling for Adams' head show great hypocrisy?