JetsetJimbo
Well-known member
- Jun 13, 2011
- 1,165
Serious question. What is stopping her from dishing up Clinton, Andrew etc?
If she did, she'd end up "committing suicide" like Epstein (although I suspect that's going to happen anyway)
Serious question. What is stopping her from dishing up Clinton, Andrew etc?
Serious question. What is stopping her from dishing up Clinton, Andrew etc?
20 years in prison
Thoughts and prayers
20 yrs for the woman , when plenty of dirty old men are still free....!!! God bless America...!! Let me hear you say it again brother...!!! Gaaaaad berlesssss Americaa...!!
How much time will she actually end up doing though. Maybe half? If she does 10 years she will have got off pretty lightly in my view.
From what I can gather, their version of remission is called 'good time'.
Ordinarily, about 56 days back for every year served.
It seems that doesn't apply to sexual offences though. So in theory she likely has to serve the full term.
I just took a few moments to read a bit more about the case (having dodged the details due to my disdain for prurience). Sorry, but you are way off target with your comment here. There were no killings, but Maxwell was to Epstein what Hindley was to Brady. Epstein is dead. So you figure Maxwell should be released? I don't agree.
As for finding some other men to prosecute, I don't think there is any limitation on that. There is no conspiracy between the courts and the police to ensure that only women are convicted of child abuse.....
I just took a few moments to read a bit more about the case (having dodged the details due to my disdain for prurience). Sorry, but you are way off target with your comment here. There were no killings, but Maxwell was to Epstein what Hindley was to Brady. Epstein is dead. So you figure Maxwell should be released? I don't agree.
As for finding some other men to prosecute, I don't think there is any limitation on that. There is no conspiracy between the courts and the police to ensure that only women are convicted of child abuse.....
I just took a few moments to read a bit more about the case (having dodged the details due to my disdain for prurience). Sorry, but you are way off target with your comment here. There were no killings, but Maxwell was to Epstein what Hindley was to Brady. Epstein is dead. So you figure Maxwell should be released? I don't agree.
As for finding some other men to prosecute, I don't think there is any limitation on that. There is no conspiracy between the courts and the police to ensure that only women are convicted of child abuse.....
.. "I was abused by Jeffrey" etc. Could throw in Robert Maxwell for good measure, he can't answer back either.
Except when the nonce is a member of the British Royal family of course.
[tweet]1542193656043655170[/tweet]
I know I'm being really dense but I haven't followed this case closely, would you mind explaining the joke?
well , you can get a fair bit done in an hour.