Geoff Lawson C***

[Storer68]

But SCG is easier to play against than Warne (far more orthodox, not as much variation, relies on spin rather than bounce) and is used as a stock bowler (well he was by Waugh) i can recall him bowling dor what seemed like days in Melbourne in 2002 he is simply not a strike bowler - has to bowl a lot of overs against decent batting sides (not Bangladesjh, not the West Indies) to take wickets.

Basically I wouldn't fear an attack that is relying on Lee, Gillespie and macGill compared to an attack relying on McGrath and Warne