I'm interested in showing why announcing a plan is a bad idea. Why are you finding this hard to grasp?So you're not interested in his plan then. Why didn't you just say that from the start rather than wasting his time insisting divulged his plan?
You got confused in a conversation between other people and now you're trying to suggest I'm wasting time etc
Ok good, so we're not at complete opposite ends of the debate then.Ok chaps, [MENTION=240]larus[/MENTION], [MENTION=36]Titanic[/MENTION] and [MENTION=4019]Triggaaar[/MENTION], I can accept that showing the opposition all your cards would be a BAD idea.
Would that be nice in an ideal world - yes. Is it realistically achievable, no. This is why:So with that in mind, shouldn't we the electorate, have a mandate on whether to accept the negotiated deal?
1) Government tells people they will get a vote to accept a deal or not
2) EU rub hands together and pat each other on the back. They offer us the worst deal in history, knowing that the public will have to reject it.
3) We reject the deal, so we don't leave the EU, the EU get what they always wanted (us to stay) and our public don't get what they wanted (to leave).
It's not perfect, but what other way is there?Or are you happy to let the government negotiate then make their negotiated agreements become law before being held to account by the population?