ROSM
Well-known member
The Guardian do say that, but it really is hypothetical numbers and I think both the SNP and Labour (esp Labour TBH) would want to avoid. It would be so fragile, one by election loss could tip the balance, you have to make sure every single time on every single vote that 323 goes through that lobby.
Refering to 1992 as you have been. Do you remember Major got a majority of 20 (dream land for Lab/Con today) in the end and his situation started to crumble because of by election losses and the "bar stewards" on his own back bench...and they supposedly were on his side! When I think of that it actually is quite staggering that this Con/Lib coalition has stayed as firm as it has.
Yes indeed he was propped up brother unionists. But that was in the days of a max 20 or so MPs outside of the 3 main parties.
The coalition was fat cleverer in that they lost loads of votes but nudged through most things on the back of the coalition agreement and amending existing legislation. Also dont forget that Cameron deferred the European question that would have split his party from top to bottom. Major didn't have that luxury