Walkers Cajun Squirrel
New member
- Mar 13, 2008
- 1,101
Not in maths, no.Is any of the higher paper multiple choice?
Not in maths, no.Is any of the higher paper multiple choice?
Not in maths, no.
Yes it is but they only ask C grade or above questions.
That is the higher paper. On the lower paper you need about 70% and C is the highest grade you can get.
True, but maybe nipple wouldn't attract such childish criticism if he didn't write such unnecessary, misplaced drivel with the sole intention of provoking a reaction.I do find this criticism of Nibble rather amusing. Acting is a massively difficult profession to break into and I think there are accepted figures that only 10% work constantly. It is rather childish to throw the 'part-time cleaner, part time extra' insult at him, when a great many actors start that off that way. It is not a cushy profession where you are guaranteed a job.
But go ahead if you feel it strengthens your arguments. Besides which, he has already stated many a time that he no longer has to support himself with a cleaning job.
You have been going on about how easy you GCSE's were??Can you just slow down and listen for a second? I NEVER said I was intelligent, nor did BOF. He correctly pointed out that it is hard to break into and a risk. I am lucky that I get a lot of work because I work my nuts off to put myself in the position where I may get lucky but I never said that you had to be intelligent to do it.
Youi must have had a different exam board to us then.I got a B on the lower paper - got 96%
You do one of ICT but that only counts as 12% of your final grade.which subjects do have that element in the higher paper?
True, but maybe nipple wouldn't attract such childish criticism if he didn't write such unnecessary, misplaced drivel with the sole intention of provoking a reaction.
You have been going on about how easy you GCSE's were??
Also your general attitude on here is that you are better and more intelligent than anyone else.
True, but maybe nipple wouldn't attract such childish criticism if he didn't write such unnecessary, misplaced drivel with the sole intention of provoking a reaction.
I posted my opinion, insensitive it may be but it's what I believe.
You dont need to be intelligent to be an actor. (Joey from friends (ok he isnt real but he is quite stupid in real life as well))
But that's not necessarily a good thing is it?Can I just say, that I genuinely don't write it to provoke a reaction. If I say something on here 99% of the time I mean it. If it looks like a wind up then I can't stop you insulting me if it serves a purpose for you but I do not try and wind people up. I posted my opinion, insensitive it may be but it's what I believe.
But that's not necessarily a good thing is it?
Afterall, you got banned on here because you wrote some repulsive "joke" about a disabled child. You then point blank refused to apologise for any offense caused.
I'm afraid you reap what you sow, and probably explains why people take the piss out of your job situation.
However, I have taken up too much time on this thread wittering on about myself so I will leave the floor.
The Australian equivalent is the HSC (Higher School Certificate) what really annoys me about that is that the results in my day were standardized - ie pushed into some sort of bell curve to ensure that there was a reasonable spread of fails, passes and HD's.... ridiculous to think your grade would be adjusted based on the performance of the whole lot of people sitting it...Hope they've changed that now...
Actually, I think the bell curve was a good thing.
Given that the intent of exams is to sort out the very capable, from the capable from the above average, etc. then that is the only way to garuntee that you isolate the top 5% (A), from the next 10% (B)...
This is what employers and universities are traditionally looking for.
In a situation where over 20% of your statistical population are gaining the top grade, that top grade IS devalued and debased.
If everyone has prizes, then the prizes don't mean much.