I think that's harsh. Until Lambert and Rowett, Stoke had changed their manager once in over 500 competitive games - Pulis was there for 7 years, Hughes for 5.I disagree on this. He's got lots of credit in the bank at Luton and if he goes on a bad run, he'll easily survive. On the other hand, if he goes on a bad run at Stoke, he's toast: the board have already shown that they're a bit trigger-happy so he's got little leeway.
Correct, and if they've all got sense, that will be recognised and addressed as soon as possible. Following on from my point above, Rowett was sacked after 8 months BUT he had been backed very heavily and has ended up wasting an absolute fortune. I'm not surprised he was sacked. If you sign players like James Mclean and Tom Ince for a combined £17m, fail to address other parts of the squad and end up far worse than the average team in the division, you deserve the sack. I actually think the Stoke board have been remarkably patient with him, considering their football has been both utter gash to watch and totally unproductive.Stoke fans are moaning that they don't score goals. But look at their strikers: Crouch is 102 years old, Berahino only scores in a leap year, Bojan is perennially missing and Diouf is not exactly prolific. Afobe's not bad at this level but even he only scores one in four games - he's not a 20-a-goal a season striker. And who's going to create? The ageing Adam and the over-rated Ince? Again, they have Allen who's very decent, but what if he's injured?