Marshy
Well-known member
BG is being totally serious he never jokes.
And is rarely wrong.BG is being totally serious he never jokes.
BG is being totally serious he never jokes.
What is the point though? Is he a bit simple or is posting bollocks in some way amusing to him?
Maybe Kayal has done something unspeakable to him?
Let me try to explain to those on here who are obviouisly too thick to understand, thankfully it is not all posters.
He is getting rave reviews about his performances and is said to be attracting attention from Championship and Premier clubs with January window in mind. His downside, it is being said, is his lack of pace When he was with us previously he sat just in front of the back four shielding them. When Stephens got injured we had to move Propper and Bissouma in order to accommodate Kayal who does not play that position or indeed the one played by Stephens. There fore it makes good sense to bring in a player who can play that position as cover for Stephens, hence the question would he be better than Kayal perhaps I should have added covering Stephens but I thought that was so obvious as to not be needed.[/QUOTE
Nope you are still not amusing me, I’ll leave you to carry on enlightening those bright enough to find this claptrap interesting.
Let me try to explain to those on here who are obviouisly too thick to understand, thankfully it is not all posters.
He is getting rave reviews about his performances and is said to be attracting attention from Championship and Premier clubs with January window in mind. His downside, it is being said, is his lack of pace When he was with us previously he sat just in front of the back four shielding them. When Stephens got injured we had to move Propper and Bissouma in order to accommodate Kayal who does not play that position or indeed the one played by Stephens. There fore it makes good sense to bring in a player who can play that position as cover for Stephens, hence the question would he be better than Kayal perhaps I should have added covering Stephens but I thought that was so obvious as to not be needed.
Was about to point out the same thing, so cheers. [emoji23]Gary Dicker, when he was with us, was technically decent, but very, very slow. Seven years later, and now well into his thirties, he unsurprisingly hasn't got any quicker. He is painfully slow. I've watched him three times this season, and even at that level he is very often late to the ball. He could no more play Dale Stephens' role in the Premier League than you could, BG.
And he doesn't even try to play that role in the SPL. He often plays centre-back now for Kilmarnock, where he has time on the ball.
The thing about him being watched by Prem sides was posted by [MENTION=3385]crodonilson[/MENTION]
[MENTION=3385]crodonilson[/MENTION] was joking. Gary Dicker isn't getting a January move to the Premier League.
But, it was an open goal I guess, to have another snide little pop at Beram Kayal, so job done.
Let me try to explain to those on here who are obviouisly too thick to understand, thankfully it is not all posters.
He is getting rave reviews about his performances and is said to be attracting attention from Championship and Premier clubs with January window in mind.
When he was with us previously he sat just in front of the back four shielding them.
When Stephens got injured we had to move Propper and Bissouma in order to accommodate Kayal who does not play that position or indeed the one played by Stephens.
There fore it makes good sense to bring in a player who can play that position as cover for Stephens, hence the question would he be better than Kayal perhaps I should have added covering Stephens but I thought that was so obvious as to not be needed.
It was not intended as nor is it a pop at Kayal because he CANNOT play the role that Stephens does so it was a serious question asking if Gary Dicker could, the simple answer is Yes or No either way we need to bring in somebody who can . Whether or not Kayal can cover Gross, Bissouma or Propper in the position that they play is totally irrelevant. My question was would he be better than Kayal so a logical question to ask.
Blimey. We're risking a paradox in the space-time continuum here. Someone to thick to know what they're on about explaining to those to thick to understand. Could get messy.
It was not intended as nor is it a pop at Kayal because he CANNOT play the role that Stephens does so it was a serious question asking if Gary Dicker could, the simple answer is No.
I accept that Kayal lined up with Stephens when we played 4-4-2 which we dont now. So he couldnt do it now that is play alongside of Stephens. As regards Dicker I think that he would have got nosebleed had he gone over the halfway line.
BG is being totally serious he never jokes.
Good player at the time, great vision and passing but sadly the speed and turning circle of a tugboat.
I think the championship was a little bit too much for him (remember him giving the ball away for Billy Sharp (RIP) to eventually score in the Donny match, but glad to see he's doing well up north.