Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Garcia: <redacted>









Giraffe

VERY part time moderator
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Aug 8, 2005
27,229
What is fact is we have spent less on transfers this season so far than we did last season.

I suspect though, although none of us can actually know, that the player budget remains the same.

And why wouldn't it? If you're Tony Bloom you've built a squad that can compete for the play offs, injuries aside it should be capable of doing so again, that's his view.

I suspect Gus's view was we should spend more again and strengthen further and push for the top two. But every manager will want more money so you can't fault him for that. Equally Bloom obviously feels for now that he has done enough, and spent enough on transfers already. You can't really fault a man that has put hundreds of millions of pounds into the club.
 








KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
21,097
Wolsingham, County Durham
What is fact is we have spent less on transfers this season so far than we did last season.

I suspect though, although none of us can actually know, that the player budget remains the same.

And why wouldn't it? If you're Tony Bloom you've built a squad that can compete for the play offs, injuries aside it should be capable of doing so again, that's his view.

I suspect Gus's view was we should spend more again and strengthen further and push for the top two. But every manager will want more money so you can't fault him for that. Equally Bloom obviously feels for now that he has done enough, and spent enough on transfers already. You can't really fault a man that has put hundreds of millions of pounds into the club.

Does this go back to the story given for when GM left - the 2 budget pot saga? (1 pot for transfers and 1 for wages).

Gus got this changed to 1 pot for everything, did he not? So even though we may have not paid much in transfer fees this year, the pot would still be depleted by loans, signing on fees, agent fees, wages etc etc.

I guess what I am trying to say is that just because we spent 2m on Leo last Jan and have not spent 2m on anyone this, it does not mean that we have a spare 2m to spend in this year's budget.
 


Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,630






skipper734

Registered ruffian
Aug 9, 2008
9,189
Curdridge
I expect the medical budget is bigger than the player budget this year! All those operations, crutches and bandages to pay for, it's a good job the physiotherapy is done in house.
 


Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
Purely out of interest, why has this thread been redacted. Other than the usual wildly uninformed speculation about how deep the BHA wedge is, there doesn't appear anything particularly contentious here - or is there?
 


Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
Are we back to you naked in bed watching the Sam Allardyce interview again? :blush:
That was way too much information the first time round. Think of the children.
 






Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,292
Back in Sussex
Purely out of interest, why has this thread been redacted. Other than the usual wildly uninformed speculation about how deep the BHA wedge is, there doesn't appear anything particularly contentious here - or is there?

It's Garcia's quote that was redacted by The Telegraph.

I wondered if I was being too subtle there.
 


Tooting Gull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
11,033
Are we sure he was misquoted? Or is it just Oscar said something that wasn't right, or was misleading, and the club with the permission of the newspaper got the change made? They are quite different. I suspect it was the latter.
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,008
Pattknull med Haksprut
Back on the original topic, Gus signed a five year contract in September 2011, along with Tanno (not sure about Chas).

He was sacked on 23rd June, which went to subsequent appeal, but it would be interesting to see in which year's accounts his compensation (if there is any) for the remainder of his contract appears. If we assume that he is on a good contract (say £1 million a year for him and Tanno) then if this is included in the playing budget (on the grounds that the manager/coach are part of the overall playing staff), then it could reduce what is available for player signings.

Lots of ifs in the above I appreciate, but the numbers might explain some of the confusion. We should also remember that last season the majority of the wages of Bridge, Upson and Hammond were being paid by their parent clubs. I suspect that is the case to a degree with Andrews and Ward though.
 


JCL - the new kid in town

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2011
1,864
Does this go back to the story given for when GM left - the 2 budget pot saga? (1 pot for transfers and 1 for wages).

Gus got this changed to 1 pot for everything, did he not? So even though we may have not paid much in transfer fees this year, the pot would still be depleted by loans, signing on fees, agent fees, wages etc etc.

I guess what I am trying to say is that just because we spent 2m on Leo last Jan and have not spent 2m on anyone this, it does not mean that we have a spare 2m to spend in this year's budget.

we may have spent 2m on Leo in Jan but i wouldn't be surprised if the accounts worked it over several years eg 500k per season for 4 seasons so taken out of 4 budgets rather than one. Additionally if they had worked it out like that they may have gone further and worked it out pro-rata so that a reduced chunk was spent out of last years budget as he was only here half a season with a larger chunk this season. That would also mean that this years budget has gone up but already accounted for
 


Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,923
West Sussex
It's Garcia's quote that was redacted by The Telegraph.

I wondered if I was being too subtle there.

Unless I was under the influence more than I thought... there are also some posts from last night which have been deleted from this thread??
 








Insider

New member
Jul 18, 2003
7,768
Brighton
Just to clarify, Oscar was not misquoted, but the quote was taken out of context (and the Telegraph were happy to rectify in order to reflect the point Oscar was making). He was speaking about the cost saving the club has had to make to bring down the overall budget of running the club - however the playing budget has increased slightly on that of last year.

That was not always the case (as Tony points out in his SP interview) as we expected to have to cut the playing budget by a small amount. However, the work that went in to cost saving in the summer and additional revenue generation (with huge help from the fans) has meant we have been able to slightly increase the budget.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here