Frankworthington
Well-known member
They can’t be stopped. Scrounging family building own house and want taxpayers to pay for it.
Damn, I thought this was another thread about the Royal family.
So did i!!
They can’t be stopped. Scrounging family building own house and want taxpayers to pay for it.
Damn, I thought this was another thread about the Royal family.
For a minute I thought this was about the Royal Family.
I thought they were ****ing off to Costa Rica?
I thought they were ****ing off to Costa Rica?
The rate he’s saving his cash he can barely **** off to Costa coffee.
The funniest aspect of this story is we’re meant to believe these two **** wits can actually get their life’s together for five minutes and build a place off the grid.
The article says "build a “remote” home and live off nature" Seeing as there is nowhere in the slightest bit remote in SE England I can only hope they are sodding off to the Scottish Highlands, or even better one of the small Scottish islands. Wanting to live a low impact life is admirable but relying on others to do so is much less admirable. The poor kids have decades of therapy ahead of them.
While I have no time for the dickheads in the article (and I agree with the sentiment), this is clearly not the case. Scumbags bagging a few quid in benefits that they shouldn't have cannot be compared to hundreds of billions of pounds being moved around the world to avoid tax.
The former might make a tiny dent in the annual deficit of the UK if completely eradicated. Removing the latter would change the entire World for the better. You can and should abhor both, but one is still MUCH worse than the other.
Re the article, does the bloke actually say he's "saving" benefits in order to move to a self sustainable house / way of life. The only actual quote I could see was that they are "using housing benefit" as a way to get to what they want to do. I.e. That's how they pay for life at present. As Mr Putdown said, you can't "save money" from housing benefit as they will only pay as much or (generally) less than the market value / full rent, so that's impossible.
Lazy, inaccurate journalism and more publicity for a pair of twats who clearly make a few quid every few years from selling their "story".......... and lots of people get angry.
Well done The Argus!
..... Scumbags bagging a few quid in benefits that they shouldn't have cannot be compared to hundreds of billions of pounds being moved around the world to avoid tax.....:
But isn't that the point? There are genuinely homeless people and there are people who are unable to work through illness or disability.
He is fit to work (in fact they both are) but they just can't be ****ed to go out and do a days graft. It is our taxes that support these wasters. If they are capable of working and choose not to they shouldn't get any support from the State. **** 'em.
And NSC’s famous **** stain family are back!
https://apple.news/Ad_irC7csSv-D8u5Vp1HTNg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
? Have you been living under a rock?How can they run that headline when she actually said “ It is very unlikely that I would not take my kids into hospital for flu-like symptoms."?
? Have you been living under a rock?
Sent from my SM-A600FN using Tapatalk
And using our tax smash to do so....
Everyone’s favourite vegan ****wits return to the news...
https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/18092749.housing-benefits-used-build-off-grid-house/