GreersElbow
New member
Talk about spectacularly misreading a post. I didn't accuse or imply anyone of being a paedophile. That was the meaning you created, so don't play the paedogeddon card on me.
My comment was merely around the main associations that people have of celebrities. So, for example, no matter how her career unfolds, some people will always associate Emma Watson with how she came to prominence for them, i.e. her role in Harry Potter, so a story of a re-casting of her as a raunchy character in '50 Shades of Grey' will challenge their pre-conceptions of her, or to put it more vividly, make them 'squirm, shiver and squirm some more' to use a Now Magazine's journalist's words.
http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/blogs/now-says/537722/emma-watson-for-50-shades-of-grey-are-you-mad
You would spoil any party.
I also don't think you have a sense of humour at all, "spectacularly misreading a post" - As if my comment was meant to be taken seriously. I suggest you try to get out more, perhaps try the pub. But watch out, people down there like banter, if you're not familiar with it. You'll struggle and it'll be like learning a new language.