Forster Saga - fans will vote with their feet

[Frutos]

Then no YOU F***ing didn't. Because the rant I had at NE was because I didn't like being told I'd missed the point of supporting BHA when I know he's a kid by comparison to the years I've supported them. Ironically, he's since even apologised for his wording 6 pages latter. And he's a man for doing that. The fight's over in that respect - and still idiots like you are jumping in and having a pop when basically it's not my fault you missed the right turning early on - preferring to go straight to binfest over something completely different. Now, will you be man-enough like NE to apologise. Or are you so pig-headed that when you misunderstand something, you're not adult enough to withdraw it?

Until you can demonstrate enough maturity to make your point without profaning, you are in no place whatever to lecture others on acting like an adult

In any case, I apologise for nothing that I said because it applies to too many on this board and I'm sick of it as an attitude.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

It feels a bit Dear Jim'll writing our ages at the end of our posts.

Yors faithFulY,

Barell of fUn,

aGed 29 1/4

 

[portlock seagull]

Spot on.

Spot on it perhaps if that was what the threads about - any views on whether NF's absence will potentially cause attendances to drop per chance?

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Dear Portlock Seagull

Thank you whole-heartedly for saving our club. I'd thought it was a big team effort, but if it was indeed just you and your FFA mates, then thanks for putting us all straight.

I was wrong about that, and I guess also, in my opinion that you have embarrased yourself enormously in this thread.

Best regards

Simon [38]

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Spot on it perhaps if that was what the threads about - any views on whether NF's absence will potentially cause attendances to drop per chance?

Directly - i.e. will [sane] people stay away in outrage over the events. Not a chance.

Indirectly - very possibly, if the worst happens, and a lack of goals leads to relegation.

Does this automatically mean the club is in the wrong? No.

 

[portlock seagull]

Until you can demonstrate enough maturity to make your point without profaning, you are in no place whatever to lecture others on acting like an adult

In any case, I apologise for nothing that I said because it applies to too many on this board and I'm sick of it as an attitude.

Ow do f*** off now. Excuse me for getting a little exasperated because my threads been hijacked by a few sanctimoneous posters like yourself. At this stage I think I'm entitled to it. But you've revealed your true colours - looking to grind an axe (about age) and anyone will do. Shame you're not a man like NE was. Expected nothing more from a "kid" like you

 

[portlock seagull]

Dear Portlock Seagull

Thank you whole-heartedly for saving our club. I'd thought it was a big team effort, but if it was indeed just you and your FFA mates, then thanks for putting us all straight.

I was wrong about that, and I guess also, in my opinion that you have embarrased yourself enormously in this thread.

Best regards

Simon [38]

Simon, since you're determined to talk about the sub-thread, I'll finally bite. I'm proud of what I did in my own little way. Nothing will change that. But really you've exposed yourself as a bit of a prick with such a childish reply such as that. I was talking to NE, not you. And never said anything like what you've implied about solitary effort. And as for embarrassing myself, I don't think I have at all. Your post count however is a clue to how many times I've read your comments from you that are, well, as you put it....embarrassing. Your most recent reply being the most recent of course.

 

[portlock seagull]

Directly - i.e. will [sane] people stay away in outrage over the events. Not a chance.

Indirectly - very possibly, if the worst happens, and a lack of goals leads to relegation.

Does this automatically mean the club is in the wrong? No.

A1. So you're saying everyone that disagrees and votes with their feet is mentally unfit. Nice one Simon. Sure many would argue the only insane ones are inside the ground at times.

A2. Glad you're finally getting onto the subject matter. We agree for what it's worth.

A3. Never asked that question. Not sure what you're on about therefore.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Simon, since you're determined to talk about the sub-thread, I'll finally bite. I'm proud of what I did in my own little way. Nothing will change that. But really you've exposed yourself as a bit of a prick with such a childish reply such as that. I was talking to NE, not you. And never said anything like what you've implied about solitary effort. And as for embarrassing myself, I don't think I have at all. Your post count however is a clue to how many times I've read your comments from you that are, well, as you put it....embarrassing. Your most recent reply being the most recent of course.

I'm fully aware who you were talking [down] to, thanks. NE can be a right idiot, frankly, but I'm with him on this. Nobody's history or anything else, gives them the right to encourage people to boycott the Albion over such an issue as Forster's dispute with the club. My post count has nothing to do with anything. Nor is it all that different to yours, frankly. How about you apologise for all the "You really don't know who you are talking to" bullshit?

Directly - i.e. will [sane] people stay away in outrage over the events. Not a chance.

Indirectly - very possibly, if the worst happens, and a lack of goals leads to relegation.

Does this automatically mean the club is in the wrong? No.

What exactly is 'embarrassing, about my 'last reply'? Looks about spot on.

 

[cjd]

A1. So you're saying everyone that disagrees and votes with their feet is mentally unfit. Nice one Simon. Sure many would argue the only insane ones are inside the ground at times.

A2. Glad you're finally getting onto the subject matter. We agree for what it's worth.

A3. Never asked that question. Not sure what you're on about therefore.

Bloody hell.......are you STILL going on about Forster....?


When you started this thread, Forster was 36............he is now 87 and living out his days peacefully in a Burgess Hill Care home.

Just let it go now.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Anyway, as you are '4 hours away from Withdean', and still on your PC, I guess you have indeed, decided to 'vote with your feet'. Good for you.

I'll try to cheer for both of us. I've decided to support the 11 players that turn out.

Going to the game now. Enjoy your evening.

 

[Billy the Fish]

Reading back through, this was one hell of a thread. I chose certain phrases very unwisely, and I'm man enough to admit that. My only point was that our club isn't about one player, no matter how good he has been for us, the club goes on after he's gone. We once had a chap called Zamora, losing him was a shame but along came Leon Knight. He flounced. And now they're both history. In a couple of years, Forster will be history aswell. Unfortunately, this saga won't ever be forgotten, which is a shame because it's a blight on his time with us.

Fair play

 

[portlock seagull]

I'm fully aware who you were talking [down] to, thanks. NE can be a right idiot, frankly, but I'm with him on this. Nobody's history or anything else, gives them the right to encourage people to boycott the Albion over such an issue as Forster's dispute with the club. My post count has nothing to do with anything. Nor is it all that different to yours, frankly. How about you apologise for all the "You really don't know who you are talking to" bullshit?



What exactly is 'embarrassing, about my 'last reply'? Looks about spot on.

You're continuing to make it up - where have I used my history....to encourage people to boycott (I'm now organising BOYCOTTS!!) the Albion over the NF debacle. FFS, you deserve to be called an idiot for that Simon (aged 38). I'm saying that dropping NF will harm our chances of improving our woeful home record and that's bad for business. And your post count does have something to do with it when blithering on about me "embarrassing" myself; by virtue of the thousands more you've made, I'm telling you, you've written some right crap down the years. Sorry if that damaged your ego. So get off your horse, tonto.

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

Beat you to the last word

 

[portlock seagull]

Anyway, as you are '4 hours away from Withdean', and still on your PC, I guess you have indeed, decided to 'vote with your feet'. Good for you.

I'll try to cheer for both of us. I've decided to support the 11 players that turn out.

Going to the game now. Enjoy your evening.

Was going to take spare ticket off my brother and not go to Norwich. But someone else now wants to do Norwich so going to do that game instead. See you at Leeds, superfan.....

 

[portlock seagull]

Beat you to the last word

 

[Barrel of Fun]

Oh, go on then...

Edit: Whoops. Meant to bounce a different thread. Ho hum.

 

[e77]

He might have jumped the shark now, but him coming off the bench for the last ten minutes when we need a goal wouldn't upset me now.

Granted that would mean us chasing a game at the moment.