You say we are quick on the break but yesterday City were quicker than us in every position on the ground and in thought, which we cant do much about.
It isn't the answer at all. Hughton has already said he doesn't do this
A number of people around me said that having Baldock available would have helped, as he runs the line and drags defenders out of position.
Defenders hate pace, especially when a counter attacking team have the players in midfield and out wide that can play that killer through ball, this I think we have. Quick strikers can turn over good defenders and get in behind and City showed that yesterday.
I guess the best example of this was Michael Owen's goal against Argentina at the World Cup in 98.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good post.
Take defenders out of their comfort zone.
Most fans now realise this. I would imagine that the club do too and will address the lack of pace up front with new players by the close of this transfer window.
Good post.
Take defenders out of their comfort zone.
Most fans now realise this. I would imagine that the club do too and will address the lack of pace up front with new players by the close of this transfer window.
But not Forestieri. A proven cheat and doesn't exactly rip the Championship apart.
We'll be going down if they don't
You're spot on there. TB and his team would know that the pace/goals aspect needs urgent attention. He'd be determined that we don't blow our chance, otherwise it's Championship football with a huge cost base.
Maybe Hughton would have left a player up if we had one with pace and quality on the ball? Just a thought.
The thing is, I think Baldock would have been perfect for yesterday, he's quick and with the space city gave us behind their defence, he could have had an good game, Hemed Murray or even wood or forrestieri would have been poor yesterday as we saw
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
So a hoofed clearance, and there were a few yesterday, giving the opposition guaranteed possession to come again. I think that is going to piss me off very quickly this season because it just invites more pressure and the chances are we will concede at some point.
CH may be a god but I seriously question how sensible that choice of defending is, if we are always going to do it.
Maybe the guy at the forum questioning some of CH's tactics at this level had a point...
I'm pretty sure City left no-one up when defending our corners.
I'm pretty sure City left no-one up when defending our corners.
No comparison. City had better players (faster, stronger, more skilful) in almost every position than our team (sorry lads, just saying) so it doesn't really matter what they did.
I'm a huge Hughton fan, I rate him as a fantastic manager for us, nobody else I'd rather have........but, like many others on this board - and in the stands - I really wish he would keep one man on the half way line at all times, ready to go haring after any long clearances (and sometimes they do have to be made; you can whine about hoofball all you like, but sometimes - just sometimes - the correct action for a defender is to put his foot through the ball, no messing) and, if not scoring, at least keeping two of the other side busy.
Quite happy for Hughton to do what he thinks is best, given his vast experience.