For those people that like Konnie Huq &/or Zoe Salmon...

[logan89]

... well they've done a FHM shoot and it will probably appear in next months issue.

http://www.fhm.com/girls/konnie-huq-and-zoe-salmon--may-issue-preview-20090320

Think there is a vote aswell, so why don't we have one.

 

[Lady Whistledown]

Oi, so much for equality on here.

If this is a Blue-Peter-specific poll, I demand an option for Gethin Jones. To the other ladies of NSC: this one's for you

 

[SirDouglasLoft]

OBVIOUSLY Zoe.

 

[Playing On The Grit]

Konnie, definitely.

She has such a dirty look about her and when she was on Blue Peter she had a sexy laugh and grin that said she is pure filth. I'm sure she knew the dads were watching!

 

[strings]

Zoe.

 

[Barrow Boy]

Konnie Huq

 

[Stoo82]

Konnie Konnie Konnie. She and Mylean Klass will both be my wifes.

 

[Couldn't Be Hyypia]

Lovely - the other one is a bit damn ordinary.

 

[Pavilionaire]

I think you're taking the piss if you feel you can take a job as a children's TV presenter, then pose in a Lad's Mag. What sort of message does that send out to kids?

 

[Djmiles]

I think you're taking the piss if you feel you can take a job as a children's TV presenter, then pose in a Lad's Mag. What sort of message does that send out to kids?

Well neither are current children's TV Presenters, so I imagine they can do whatever the hell they want!

 

[Pavilionaire]

The fact neither are CURRENTLY working as kids presenters is not the point, it's the fact that they DID previously.

Of course they can do what they want, but having had the Blue Peter gig they should have decent incomes from presenting for years to come. Posing in lads mags shows that they're either shite at presenting and no longer in demand, or they are IN demand but just greedy for the extra cash - both of which are wrong.

 

[Silent Bob]

Simple solution, don't let children read FHM?

 

[MattBackHome]

The fact neither are CURRENTLY working as kids presenters is not the point, it's the fact that they DID previously.

Of course they can do what they want, but having had the Blue Peter gig they should have decent incomes from presenting for years to come. Posing in lads mags shows that they're either shite at presenting and no longer in demand, or they are IN demand but just greedy for the extra cash - both of which are wrong.

I disagree with this, wholeheartedly.

 

[strings]

I think you're taking the piss if you feel you can take a job as a children's TV presenter, then pose in a Lad's Mag. What sort of message does that send out to kids?

I see what you are saying, but Fearne Cotton and Holly Willoughby both spring to mind as being ex-kids presenters that have done lads-mags shoots.

 

[Marshy]

The Huq

 

[patchamalbion]

definitly konnie

 

[Uncle C]

I see what you are saying, but Fearne Cotton and Holly Willoughby both spring to mind as being ex-kids presenters that have done lads-mags shoots.

Pics?

 

[strings]

Pics?

I'm at work now... will try to post later when; 1) I am at home, and 2) when the girlfriend isn't looking!

 

[Skint Gull]

The fact neither are CURRENTLY working as kids presenters is not the point, it's the fact that they DID previously.

Of course they can do what they want, but having had the Blue Peter gig they should have decent incomes from presenting for years to come. Posing in lads mags shows that they're either shite at presenting and no longer in demand, or they are IN demand but just greedy for the extra cash - both of which are wrong.

I presume this is a wind up?

 

[Lady Whistledown]

Gethin, Gethin, Gethin