SIMMO SAYS
Well-known member
You should know as you know everything about me, so you say.
Perhaps an email to your mate [MENTION=561]Insider[/MENTION] will prompt a few sackings in West Lower
You should know as you know everything about me, so you say.
if you think that is appropriate and the correct area go ahead.
I realise that the bomb scenario is hypothetical but is possible.
[/B]
I find this one hard to believe
I can’t comprehend how many people genuinely think that the reason for this is so that they might sell a hundred (literally) extra cups of tea 19 times a year.
It’s like there’s a natural ingrained reaction to think that everything that the club does has a sinister motive. It’s not 1997. We’re owned by a benevolent fan who’s been happy to continue to support loss making aspects of the club, like women’s football and AITC, despite having already poured in hundreds of millions of his own cash with no realistic chance of ever seeing a return.
So do I. My husband was taken ill before kick off a couple of years ago, and wanted to go home, telling me to stay and enjoy the match. He went to the barrier and asked them five times to let him out.
All they kept replying was 'You can't come back in if you leave'. He was feeling really rough, and was tempted to push the bloke out of the way to get outside, but a steward who was a regular in our block saw him, and asked the steward on the gate to let him out.
Even then the gate bloke argued, and my other half shouted I am ill, I want to go home!! He then got out.
I realise that the bomb scenario is hypothetical but is possible.
I can’t comprehend how many people genuinely think that the reason for this is so that they might sell a hundred (literally) extra cups of tea 19 times a year.
It’s like there’s a natural ingrained reaction to think that everything that the club does has a sinister motive. It’s not 1997. We’re owned by a benevolent fan who’s been happy to continue to support loss making aspects of the club, like women’s football and AITC, despite having already poured in hundreds of millions of his own cash with no realistic chance of ever seeing a return.
I can’t comprehend how many people genuinely think that the reason for this is so that they might sell a hundred (literally) extra cups of tea 19 times a year.
It’s like there’s a natural ingrained reaction to think that everything that the club does has a sinister motive. It’s not 1997. We’re owned by a benevolent fan who’s been happy to continue to support loss making aspects of the club, like women’s football and AITC, despite having already poured in hundreds of millions of his own cash with no realistic chance of ever seeing a return.
A lot of people profess to be lifelong fans but are ready to twist the knife in at every opportunity.
I agree. I am peeved about this, but flipping love the club (much more than I should) and the loss of a cuppa won't hold me back!
If they want to remove all missiles [luzzing objects] then they must rob you of all your loose change as that is a frequent flyer at football grounds ....
If it was financial the club would put 10p on a pint and raise far more money than banning flasks.
This will be advice given to the club and wouldn't have originated from within.
Laptops will be next.
Without turning this into a conspiracy theory I'm of the firm belief that the club has been advised over the last few years to increase security and this started before the Premier League and after the Rugby World Cup.
I'd also suggest the club are trying to perform a balancing act against attempting to make it one of the most "open" arenas in the country.
Is there another ground where away and home fans can mingle around drinking INSIDE the ground after the game?
At the end of the day security is expensive. The club would save money if it dropped security and bag searches all together.
The club aren't being totally transparent about the reasons but then again why unnecessarily worry people.
The ban on sweets on 1901 however is the usual type of Ryanair corporate pettiness.
There is no need to come into line with other arenas since (for instance) not all airlines behave like Ryanair.
If you bring a packed lunch that's different, but a ban on sweets? Even the airlines don't do that....
Ye is well remember you mentioning it which is on of the reasons why I find it hard to believe
I know a couple of people who are in the seats who have to have gluten free food. Everything at the Amex is loaded with gluten, pies, pizzas, hot dogs, sausage rolls etc.