So true…….You're alright thanks. I've never watched morning TV since Zig and Zag and I replaced the Today programme with music during lockdown. I'd advise everyone to. It goes much better with coffee and is much better for your mental health.
So true…….You're alright thanks. I've never watched morning TV since Zig and Zag and I replaced the Today programme with music during lockdown. I'd advise everyone to. It goes much better with coffee and is much better for your mental health.
Zig and Zag. Now you're talkingYou're alright thanks. I've never watched morning TV since Zig and Zag and I replaced the Today programme with music during lockdown. I'd advise everyone to. It goes much better with coffee and is much better for your mental health.
are they standing for election? brilliant if they elected then the standard of MPs would increase by a gazillion percent.Zig and Zag. Now you're talking
Never mind any political bias, Fiona Bruce needs to be spoken to about interrupting and excusing GBH as a 'one off.' Fiona Bruce is an ambassador for Refuge.
I agree.Stopped watching programs about politics a few years ago. My life is much happier now.
Fiona Bruce is an ambassador for Refuge. She should know better that it is never a one off. Anybody who has had any experience of DV will not excuse it as a one off.Ok after watching that clip and at the risk of being slammed I would like to comment on what I perceive to be Bruce's motive. Johnson is described as a wife beater, which brings with it the connotation of someone who repeatedly and systematically abuses their partner, Bruce is pointing out that Yes he did hit her, yes his wife has claimed that her nose was broken and that those who know the couple have stated that this incident was not part of a continuous form of behaviour. I get what she is trying to do, put the situation into context, but I also acknowledge that it does seem like she is defending the behavior which I don't think she is. As egregious as breaking your partners nose in a moment of anger is, I feel, and clearly so does Bruce that this act of violence falls into a different category than what is generally perceived as 'wife beater"
The breaking of the nose may have been a one off, but not necessarily the domestic abuse. And it's hardly for the friends to say what went on behind the Johnson's closed doors or how often it happened. I doubt SJ indulged in that behaviour while his friends were round for drinks.Ok after watching that clip and at the risk of being slammed I would like to comment on what I perceive to be Bruce's motive. Johnson is described as a wife beater, which brings with it the connotation of someone who repeatedly and systematically abuses their partner, Bruce is pointing out that Yes he did hit her, yes his wife has claimed that her nose was broken and that those who know the couple have stated that this incident was not part of a continuous form of behaviour. I get what she is trying to do, put the situation into context, but I also acknowledge that it does seem like she is defending the behavior which I don't think she is. As egregious as breaking your partners nose in a moment of anger is, I feel, and clearly so does Bruce that this act of violence falls into a different category than what is generally perceived as 'wife beater"
What on earth are you doing on NSC then?I don't watch QT because I find people arguing but never willing to change their opinion, no matter what is said, probably the biggest waste of time going....
Just for balance, Jo Coburn is married to someone who worked for the Labour government. Makes the Lineker thing even more bizarre.How many people getting their knickers in a twist over Lineker are equally outraged that the moderator of the BBC's primary political show is married to someone who has been paid to advertise for the Tories?
I believe her being treated for a broken nose was a medical fact. But carry onOk after watching that clip and at the risk of being slammed I would like to comment on what I perceive to be Bruce's motive. Johnson is described as a wife beater, which brings with it the connotation of someone who repeatedly and systematically abuses their partner, Bruce is pointing out that Yes he did hit her, yes his wife has claimed that her nose was broken and that those who know the couple have stated that this incident was not part of a continuous form of behaviour. I get what she is trying to do, put the situation into context, but I also acknowledge that it does seem like she is defending the behavior which I don't think she is. As egregious as breaking your partners nose in a moment of anger is, I feel, and clearly so does Bruce that this act of violence falls into a different category than what is generally perceived as 'wife beater"
Try reading what I wrote then get back to me when you have worked out what I am sayingI believe her being treated for a broken nose was a medical fact. But carry on
And you have evidence that there is a pattern of domestic abuse or are you just making assumptions to fit a narrative you likeThe breaking of the nose may have been a one off, but not necessarily the domestic abuse. And it's hardly for the friends to say what went on behind the Johnson's closed doors or how often it happened. I doubt SJ indulged in that behaviour while his friends were round for drinks.
I did. In fact I quoted exactly what you saidTry reading what I wrote then get back to me when you have worked out what I am saying
Really? lets say two siblings get into a row and one gets punched does this represent sibling abuse or is it well out of order but a once off all the same. I am not defending what happened rather putting it into context given the accompanying evidence, as was BruceFiona Bruce is an ambassador for Refuge. She should know better that it is never a one off. Anybody who has had any experience of DV will not excuse it as a one off.
It is GBH not just a slap. Two women die every week at the hands of their spouse or partner.
Oh how droll.I did. In fact I quoted exactly what you said
Fiona Bruce used hearsay ‘his friends say it was a one off’Really? lets say two siblings get into a row and one gets punched does this represent sibling abuse or is it well out of order but a once off all the same. I am not defending what happened rather putting it into context given the accompanying evidence, as was Bruce
Never, wow.Fiona Bruce is an ambassador for Refuge. She should know better that it is never a one off. Anybody who has had any experience of DV will not excuse it as a one off.
It is GBH not just a slap. Two women die every week at the hands of their spouse or partner.