pastafarian
Well-known member
Sir Lenny Henry would disagree with you!
what about Ainsley Harriott ?
Sir Lenny Henry would disagree with you!
In the past jobs lost to tech have been replaced by more jobs elsewhere. It has been argued were approaching a time where this won't happen.
by those overlooking the previous form for such predictions. there's no reason to suggest the same wont occur again, with un-imagined or existing jobs becoming available in greater numbers in the future.
what about Ainsley Harriott ?
Cameron would rather give it to foreigners than us as he isn't fussed about hardship for the poorer classes.
Agree that we are moving in this direction. There will be fewer jobs so something will need to be done. Solution, population reduction? No you need customers to make money, so the Finnish idea is an idea that is likely to grow. Scandinavia is often ahead in problem solving, noticed that in my time there.Something like this is going to have to happen in the UK. As automation takes over more and more jobs, there simply won't be enough employment for everyone to have a job if they want to or not. It's not going to be long before all taxi drivers, lorry drivers etc are replaced by automated cars. That's maybe 1,000,000 jobs gone? Then the knock on effect of automated cars. Why stay in a hotel when you can just get into an automated car, tell it to take you 8 hours away and have a sleep? So, there are less people needed in hotels.
Agree that we are moving in this direction. There will be fewer jobs so something will need to be done. Solution, population reduction? No you need customers to make money, so the Finnish idea is an idea that is likely to grow. Scandinavia is often ahead in problem solving, noticed that in my time there.
Well, obviously that wouldn't work out well with current cars, but for future ones that don't need a driver, then they are obviously going to make ones that have a proper bed as lots of people will be doing this.
This scheme sounds like a Socialist's wet dream the state funding everyone![]()
Which backs up my argument in post 6.
I really can't see it happening in the UK though.
This scheme sounds like a Socialist's wet dream the state funding everyone![]()
I suspect the argument is, that no-one gets stuck in the benefits trap. It will force people to earn enough to support themselves, rather than rely on handouts over and above what everyone else gets.800 euros is a nice chunk of state hand out cash if you already have a job.
If you are unlucky enough to find yourself out of work in Helsinki and there are no benefits at all would you be able to afford food after rent and utilities?
Except that there's plenty of backing for this from conservative economists: see here, here and here
Even arch-conservative thinker Charles Murray has tinkered with the idea, although he hasn't quite got it right.
In fact, I'd say that it's an idea more associated with the right than the left - Switzerland is considering it and that's scarcely a Marxist state
I suspect the argument is, that no-one gets stuck in the benefits trap. It will force people to earn enough to support themselves, rather than rely on handouts over and above what everyone else gets.
WTF would the Daily Mail have to write about if this were to be adopted in the UK?