South west gull
New member
- Nov 3, 2021
- 1,008
Who would have thought that ? The defention of sitting on the fence
Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
can’t really blame them for wanting to join given Putins little excursion.
however, wether it gives security or makes hostilities more likely only time will tell.
Sweden next?
Turkey seem to be unhappy, but I'd have thought that is just a negotiating ploy so they can get authorisation for F35 purchases and/or F16 Viper upgrades.
Yes, yes, but if they can get their denied Viper upgrades to their F16s they will be much happier.Turkey is unhappy as a lot of opposition from Kurdish Turks is in Finland.
can’t really blame them for wanting to join given Putins little excursion.
however, wether it gives security or makes hostilities more likely only time will tell.
Sweden next?
Yup. Nothing to do with security obviously. "Join NATO and we'll buy a lot of weapons from you".
I'm responding to your quote in this thread instead to avoid derailing an important thread.Now I know you are without doubt, a windup merchant. You Swedes are v happy to join NATO now. And you will be welcome to enhance the defence of our north Eastern/Baltic flank alongside our Finnish friends
Maybe you have a different definition of Imperialistic and invasive than I do, can you explain how you associate these words with NATO?I'm responding to your quote in this thread instead to avoid derailing an important thread.
Some Swedes are very happy to join NATO. I'm not. As I said, NATO is imperialistic and invasive and I wan't to be no part of it.
Normally and historically, the Swedish people doesn't want it either, but the ruling family here saw the opportunity to use the fear in February and told their ("our") government to join. Personally, I've been against the idea always and will remain anti-NATO.
Bombing several nations to cause divides and to install Western-friendly governments is the short answer.Maybe you have a different definition of Imperialistic and invasive than I do, can you explain how you associate these words with NATO?
Are you sure you’re not confusing NATO with one of its constituent nations? Which nations have been bombed by NATO?Bombing several nations to cause divides and to install Western-friendly governments is the short answer.
Swansman thinking he represents the whole of his country, the boy will never learnI'm responding to your quote in this thread instead to avoid derailing an important thread.
Some Swedes are very happy to join NATO. I'm not. As I said, NATO is imperialistic and invasive and I wan't to be no part of it.
Normally and historically, the Swedish people doesn't want it either, but the ruling family here saw the opportunity to use the fear in February and told their ("our") government to join. Personally, I've been against the idea always and will remain anti-NATO.
Libya and Serbia/Kosovo are the most obvious examples.Which nations?
No, I'm saying I'm against NATO. Lots of Swedes are, most these days aren't.Swansman thinking he represents the whole of his country, the boy will never learn
Ok. I get where you are coming from now.Libya and Serbia/Kosovo are the most obvious examples.
Bombing several nations to cause divides and to install Western-friendly governments is the short answer.