Hampster Gull
Well-known member
- Dec 22, 2010
- 13,465
Is this where the wembley money went?
Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland (FAI) to stop legal action over Thierry's Henry's handball in Ireland's World Cup play-off defeat by France in 2009, it has been claimed.
FAI chief executive John Delaney said the association believed it had a legal case against Fifa.
A fee of 5 million euros (£3.6m) was then agreed to drop a case against the organisation, Delaney said.
Well the Irish FA were understandably pissed off and in a knee jerk reaction decided to challenge the result; common sense would suggest that it would have been booted out of court, but what I think is more telling is that FIFA were willing to back-up the money truck to make the problem go away. If I was in the IFA I would have thought "well obviously we aren't going to win, but 5 million euros is 5 million euros". I strongly suspect that this is the corrupt kind of shenanigans that FIFA have been up to...
So who is worse?
FIFA for offering or the Irish for keeping it shut
So who is worse?
FIFA for offering or the Irish for keeping it shut
So, imagine that we lose a cup tie because of a blatant penalty not given, or handball not seen. Our opponents get a lucrative next tie against Man U.
Does this mean that we can sue the F.A .?
If that is a precedent, it will happen, sure enough.....and it is all wrong!
Yes, it sort of implies FIFA paid the ref to make the decision otherwise they have no liability for an honest mistake!
But you do wonder. Who would FIFA rather have had in the finals:France or Ireland? I think we all know the answer to that. Normally, this would be in the ranks of conspiracy theories but when you get an organisation as fundamentally corrupt as FIFA, you start questioning it.
And if you question that, you can then look at South Korea beating Italy, which is probably the worst refereeing performance I've ever seen, but awfully convenient for the hosts reaching the semi final. Italy claimed they'd be cheated out of a place but we all put it down to sour grapes - perhaps it wasn't. Is this another conspiracy theory? We'll never know but it's shocking that it's even being thought about.
Yes, it sort of implies FIFA paid the ref to make the decision otherwise they have no liability for an honest mistake!
I'm not sure that it does imply that really, I'm more inclined now to think that the FAI are the ones that have more to be ashamed of by even thinking of going through the courts. Take your lumps.Yes, it sort of implies FIFA paid the ref to make the decision otherwise they have no liability for an honest mistake!
Nothing is ruled out as far as FIFA are concerned. Perhaps FIFA are the Illuminati?
Surely Fifa has to be disbanded and a new body formed. I don't think these scandals are gonna end anytime soon and that's not even mentioning all the shocking human rights violations taking place in Qatar just to build the fancy stadiums!
But you do wonder. Who would FIFA rather have had in the finals:France or Ireland? I think we all know the answer to that. Normally, this would be in the ranks of conspiracy theories but when you get an organisation as fundamentally corrupt as FIFA, you start questioning it.
And if you question that, you can then look at South Korea beating Italy, which is probably the worst refereeing performance I've ever seen, but awfully convenient for the hosts reaching the semi final. Italy claimed they'd be cheated out of a place but we all put it down to sour grapes - perhaps it wasn't. Is this another conspiracy theory? We'll never know but it's shocking that it's even being thought about.